I don’t think you’re getting it…SallyMae wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 11:04 amThat's not a problem now. I don't see why it would become one.Slimshandy wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 10:49 am Yeah, her handicapped class…And yet… there are no women who could compete in Usain Bolt’s class.
The only reason for grouping sports by gender in the first place is to sort by ability. Alas, it turns out that simple sorting system has failed us in so many ways, because now that we are not hidebound by religious bigotry, people can admit that the original gender classes don't work for everyone. We have to develop more sophisticated sorting systems, and pretending it can never be done is limiting people to the old bigotries and failing to acknowledge that not everyone fits.
I think we can reach a point where everyone can grow and stretch and strive and have a chance for glory in sports no matter their gender. We just need to work to figure out the best system.
Once you get to the top most level of many sports, men are bigger, faster and stronger. The fastest woman was 5’7, the fastest man is 6’5… the best female heavyweight is 165 pounds, the best male heavyweight is 278 pounds.
In your method of being more fair, women will never again have a chance at being in those uppermost levels.