Arizona Supreme Court rules a near-total abortion ban from 1864 is enforceable

Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.

Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source

Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.

Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.

Report when things come up.

Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.

Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Francee89
Regent
Regent
Posts: 4536
Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 7:13 pm

Unread post

The ruling is on hold for 14 days, and voters will likely have a chance to weigh in on a ballot measure enshrining abortion rights in the state's constitution this fall.



PHOENIX — The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a 160-year-old near-total abortion ban still on the books in the state is enforceable, a bombshell decision that adds the state to the growing lists of places where abortion care is effectively banned.

The ruling allows an 1864 law in Arizona to stand that made abortion a felony punishable by two to five years in prison for anyone who performs one or helps a woman obtain one.

The law — which was codified in 1901, and again in 1913 — outlaws abortion from the moment of conception but includes an exception to save the woman’s life.

That Civil War-era law — enacted a half-century before Arizona even gained statehood — was never repealed and an appellate court ruled last year that it could remain on the books as long as it was “harmonized” with a 2022 law, leading to substantial confusion in Arizona regarding exactly when during a pregnancy abortion was outlawed.

The decision — which could shutter abortion clinics in the state — effectively undoes a lower court’s ruling that stated that a more recent 15-week ban from March 2022 superseded the 1864 law.

The Arizona Supreme Court said it would put its decision on hold for 14 days, writing that it would send the case back to a lower court so that court could consider “additional constitutional challenges” that haven’t yet been cleared up.

Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, said moments after the ruling that she would not enforce the law.

“Let me be completely clear, as long as I am Attorney General, no woman or doctor will be prosecuted under this draconian law in this state,” Mayes said in a statement, adding that the decision was “unconscionable” and “an affront to freedom.”

Democrats all the way up to President Joe Biden also blasted the ruling.

“Millions of Arizonans will soon live under an even more extreme and dangerous abortion ban, which fails to protect women even when their health is at risk or in tragic cases of rape or incest,” Biden said in a statement. He called the ban “cruel” and “a result of the extreme agenda of Republican elected officials who are committed to ripping away women’s freedom” and vowed to “continue to fight to protect reproductive rights.”

Vice President Kamala Harris announced shortly after the ruling that she would travel to Arizona on Friday “to continue her leadership in the fight for reproductive freedoms."

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs called for the GOP-controlled Legislature, which is currently in session, to repeal the 1864 ban, though there was no immediate indication that Republican lawmakers in either chamber would take up such an effort.

"We are 14 days away from this extreme ban coming back to life," Hobbs, a Democrat, said at a press conference. "It must be repealed immediately."

While Hobbs said she was "sure" reproductive rights advocates would appeal the ruling in the 14-day window they were given, she also suggested that the best avenue to counter the ruling would be for voters to support abortion rights on the November ballot.

"It is more urgent than ever that Arizonans have the opportunity to vote to enshrine the right to abortion in our constitution this November. I’m confident that Arizonans will support this ballot measure, and I’m going to continue doing everything in my power to make sure it is successful," Hobbs said.

In a 4-2 ruling, the court’s majority concluded that the 15-week ban “does not create a right to, or otherwise provide independent statutory authority for, an abortion that repeals or restricts” the Civil War-era ban “but rather is predicated entirely on the existence of a federal constitutional right to an abortion since disclaimed” by the 2022 Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade.

“Absent the federal constitutional abortion right, and because” the 2022 law "does not independently authorize abortion, there is no provision in federal or state law prohibiting” the 1864 ban.

They added, that the ban “is now enforceable.”



The issue, however, could soon be in the hands of voters.

Abortion rights groups in the state are likely to succeed in their goal of putting a proposed constitutional amendment on the November ballot that would create a “fundamental right” to receive abortion care up until fetal viability, or about the 24th week of pregnancy.

If voters approved the ballot measure, it would effectively undo the 1864 ban that now remains law in the state. It would bar the state from restricting abortion care in situations where the health or life of the pregnant person is at risk after the point of viability, according to the treating health care professional.

That ballot effort is one of at least 11 across the country that seek to put the issue directly in the hands of voters — a move that has the potential to significantly boost turnout for Democratic candidates emphasizing the issue.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna146915
Francee89
Regent
Regent
Posts: 4536
Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 7:13 pm

Unread post

Kari Lake, 2022: “I'm incredibly thrilled that we are going to have a great law that's already on the books. I believe it's ARS 13-3603, so it will prohibit abortion in Arizona except to save the life of a mother. And I think we're going to be paving the way and setting course for other states to follow."

Kari Lake, today: “I oppose today's ruling, and I am calling on Katie Hobbs and the State Legislature to come up with an immediate common sense solution that Arizonans can support.”

World class shamelessly desperate lying.
WellPreserved
Donated
Donated
Queen Mother
Queen Mother
Posts: 9990
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 9:52 pm

Unread post

Francee89 wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 4:23 pm Kari Lake, 2022: “I'm incredibly thrilled that we are going to have a great law that's already on the books. I believe it's ARS 13-3603, so it will prohibit abortion in Arizona except to save the life of a mother. And I think we're going to be paving the way and setting course for other states to follow."

Kari Lake, today: “I oppose today's ruling, and I am calling on Katie Hobbs and the State Legislature to come up with an immediate common sense solution that Arizonans can support.”

World class shamelessly desperate lying.
Gosh she's insufferable. I hope that Gallego can expand his lead by November by such a wide margin that no one needs to hear from her again.

Ha!
"The books that the world calls immoral are books that show its own shame." - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
Quorra2.0
Regent
Regent
Posts: 4854
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2018 10:39 am

Unread post

In addition to this law, in which Arizona was not a state yet when written, other events of 1864: the continuation of the US Civil War, the Long Walk of the Navajo, Arizona had an anti-miscegenation law…
Della
Princess
Princess
Posts: 22315
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Unread post

Francee89 wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 4:23 pm Kari Lake, 2022: “I'm incredibly thrilled that we are going to have a great law that's already on the books. I believe it's ARS 13-3603, so it will prohibit abortion in Arizona except to save the life of a mother. And I think we're going to be paving the way and setting course for other states to follow."

Kari Lake, today: “I oppose today's ruling, and I am calling on Katie Hobbs and the State Legislature to come up with an immediate common sense solution that Arizonans can support.”

World class shamelessly desperate lying.
🤡
306/232

But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
User avatar
MonarchMom
Princess Royal
Princess Royal
Posts: 5780
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 8:52 pm

Unread post

Party of "limited government" imposes their own beliefs on the medical decisions of women.
User avatar
SoFloMom
Duchess
Duchess
Posts: 1496
Joined: Fri May 22, 2020 8:25 am

Unread post

This country is so ass backwards.
Della
Princess
Princess
Posts: 22315
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Unread post

SoFloMom wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:01 pm This country is so ass backwards.
Republicans are trying to take us back to the good old days. That's MAGA.
306/232

But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
Francee89
Regent
Regent
Posts: 4536
Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 7:13 pm

Unread post

Arizona Republicans passed a 15-week ban in 2022 that explicitly didn’t repeal the 1864 ban, knowing it would be upheld and enforced if Roe was overturned. Now, many (electorally vulnerable) Republicans seem pretty desperate to try to distance themselves from this totally foreseeable outcome ahead of November, where they’ll be up for election at the same time that voters will have the opportunity to enshrine abortion as a constitutional right:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna147085

Knowing they’re trying to save their own jobs, it makes this sudden opposition to restrictive abortion laws seem just *slightly* less than sincere.
AZOldGal66
Countess
Countess
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2023 12:49 pm

Unread post

As someone who is pro life, I'm totally against this ban and I suspect that voters will bring a close to this atrocity in November. I also suspect that an appeal will be filed in the coming days.

"Breakdown on Arizona Supreme Court abortion law ruling" https://www.azfamily.com/2024/04/10/faq ... ing-means/
just an old coot 😉🌵
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic