Alabama pushes two bills to restrict what’s in the library: ‘It’s creating a nanny state.’

Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.

Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source

Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.

Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.

Report when things come up.

Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.

Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Della
Princess
Princess
Posts: 22317
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Unread post

"The bill prohibits materials including sexual intercourse, bestiality, masturbation, defecation and “lewd exhibition of the genitals.” It also includes language focusing on drag performances around minors, including: “Persons who are dressed in sexually revealing, exaggerated, or provocative clothing or costumes, or are stripping, or engaged in lewd or lascivious dancing, presentations, or activities.”

In addition to books, the bill lists a range of library materials, including digital materials, audio and visual materials. The bill excludes college and university libraries.

But a second bill, HB425, just filed in the state legislature would extend library restrictions to university libraries and would also prevent libraries in the state from joining the American Library Association."

https://www.al.com/news/2024/04/alabama ... state.html
306/232

But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
User avatar
MonarchMom
Princess Royal
Princess Royal
Posts: 5780
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 8:52 pm

Unread post

Sometimes it seems like the country is in a race to the bottom intellectually.
User avatar
Aletheia
Regent
Regent
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 8:44 pm
Location: England

Unread post

I wondered how they intended to avoid the Bible getting banned, so I read the actual bill. The escape clause seems to be this bit:
  • a. The average person, applying contemporary community
    standards, would find that the material, taken as a whole,
    appeals to the prurient interest of minors; and.
  • b. The material depicts or describes sexual conduct,
    breast nudity, or genital nudity, in a way which is patently
    offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community with
    respect to what is suitable for minors; and.
  • c. A reasonable person would find that the material,
    taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political,
    or scientific value for minors.
https://alison.legislature.state.al.us/ ... 85-int.pdf
WellPreserved
Donated
Donated
Queen Mother
Queen Mother
Posts: 9996
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 9:52 pm

Unread post

It's effectively progressing to the goal of privatized education and an effort to segregate students.
"The books that the world calls immoral are books that show its own shame." - Oscar Wilde
WellPreserved
Donated
Donated
Queen Mother
Queen Mother
Posts: 9996
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 9:52 pm

Unread post

My county recently suspended a One Division, One Book community reading of the book "Wishtree" because a parent from outside the county complained about the red oak in the book not using gendered pronouns. She claims it's "indoctrination of children into transgender lifestyle". <sigh> I really do worry about the education of children in conservative states and districts.
"The books that the world calls immoral are books that show its own shame." - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
MonarchMom
Princess Royal
Princess Royal
Posts: 5780
Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 8:52 pm

Unread post

WellPreserved wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 9:22 pm It's effectively progressing to the goal of privatized education and an effort to segregate students.
I think you are right that the goal is to tear down public education and erode support for public schools. This would enable public funds to be channeled into private and religious schools under the guise of "choice."
Della
Princess
Princess
Posts: 22317
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Unread post

MonarchMom wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2024 8:40 am
WellPreserved wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 9:22 pm It's effectively progressing to the goal of privatized education and an effort to segregate students.
I think you are right that the goal is to tear down public education and erode support for public schools. This would enable public funds to be channeled into private and religious schools under the guise of "choice."
At this point, I believe they are moving towards changing public schools to Christian schools. No new infrastructure needed.
306/232

But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
jessilin0113
Regent
Regent
Posts: 2341
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:42 pm

Unread post

WellPreserved wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2024 8:30 am My county recently suspended a One Division, One Book community reading of the book "Wishtree" because a parent from outside the county complained about the red oak in the book not using gendered pronouns. She claims it's "indoctrination of children into transgender lifestyle". <sigh> I really do worry about the education of children in conservative states and districts.
Just to be clear, a parent was mad that a tree wasn't gendered??
Slimshandy
Duchess
Duchess
Posts: 1448
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am

Unread post

I’m pretty ok with needing parental permission to give kids books about beastiality.
WellPreserved
Donated
Donated
Queen Mother
Queen Mother
Posts: 9996
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 9:52 pm

Unread post

jessilin0113 wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2024 8:58 am
WellPreserved wrote: Mon Apr 08, 2024 8:30 am My county recently suspended a One Division, One Book community reading of the book "Wishtree" because a parent from outside the county complained about the red oak in the book not using gendered pronouns. She claims it's "indoctrination of children into transgender lifestyle". <sigh> I really do worry about the education of children in conservative states and districts.
Just to be clear, a parent was mad that a tree wasn't gendered??
Damn those monoecious trees. The line in the book that caused the parent's ire was " “Call me she. Call me he. Anything will work.” The parent claimed that "Wishtree's" nonbinary account of the oak's identity, was "indoctrination at its finest." The three conservative Christians on our school board agreed with her and the book was removed and the community reading was suspended.

AND get this. April is when all our county non-profit groups ask for money from the county budget. The board of supervisors is contemplating not funding those non-profits who didn't cancel their coinciding events with the reading of "Wishtree" (our county theater, arts center, and library). At the same time our town council (more liberal and reasonable) are working on re-structuring their budget to accommodate giving to these non-profits. <sigh>

School board meeting tonight and the author of "Wishtree" will be present so should be interesting!
"The books that the world calls immoral are books that show its own shame." - Oscar Wilde
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic