Rachel Dolezal fired from Arizona teaching job due to OnlyFans account

[jessilin0113]

I don't give two figs about her activities outside of work as long as they don't impact the children directly.

I can only imagine some of the things my teachers might have been involved in, lol.

It isn't uncommon for certain professions to have a line in their contracts something similar to:

Avoid doing anything which could make the public doubt the motives or integrity of a member of staff of the school or bring the school into disrepute.

Are we, as a society, ready for the conversation that S*x work of any kind should not be considered disreputable?

[Quorra2.0]

She signed a contract, she was aware of the policy and that if she continued her activity on OnlyFans she was violating the terms. She chose to continue, she chose to out herself. This was the consequence.

[Della]

I don't give two figs about her activities outside of work as long as they don't impact the children directly.

I can only imagine some of the things my teachers might have been involved in, lol.

It isn't uncommon for certain professions to have a line in their contracts something similar to:

Avoid doing anything which could make the public doubt the motives or integrity of a member of staff of the school or bring the school into disrepute.

I'm sure that line was somewhere in the employee handbook; it was a parochial school.

[SoFloMom]

I don't give two figs about her activities outside of work as long as they don't impact the children directly.

I can only imagine some of the things my teachers might have been involved in, lol.

It isn't uncommon for certain professions to have a line in their contracts something similar to:

Avoid doing anything which could make the public doubt the motives or integrity of a member of staff of the school or bring the school into disrepute.

I’m genuinely curious - what other professions have this line in their contract? Do medical professionals have this? The corporate world?

[Slimshandy]

I don't give two figs about her activities outside of work as long as they don't impact the children directly.

I can only imagine some of the things my teachers might have been involved in, lol.

It isn't uncommon for certain professions to have a line in their contracts something similar to:

Avoid doing anything which could make the public doubt the motives or integrity of a member of staff of the school or bring the school into disrepute.

Are we, as a society, ready for the conversation that S*x work of any kind should not be considered disreputable?

No… it is disreputable.

I agree it should be legal because the government shouldn’t be allowed to tell people what to do with their own bodies… but it’s not in any way a reputable position. It’s damaging to society, and puts women at severe risk for homicide and suicide.

[Murdoc's Mistress]

Her past aside, I stand by the belief that a teacher can take any legal side job, even porn. Maybe the schools need to start reprimanding parents for being nosy fucktards. You know someone's husband or son accessed the account and some PTA bitch is the one who complained.

[Pjmm]

No one should be fired for legal activities they conduct on their personal time. However, Dolezal was pretty stupid to link to her OnlyFans account in her Instagram.

I feel this about instagram and Facebook: whatever your private settings if you don't want your boss, mama, priest or the cops to know don't post it. Tiktok might be a bit different since you can use a fake name but basically still be careful.

[Pjmm]

I don't give two figs about her activities outside of work as long as they don't impact the children directly.

I can only imagine some of the things my teachers might have been involved in, lol.

It isn't uncommon for certain professions to have a line in their contracts something similar to:

Avoid doing anything which could make the public doubt the motives or integrity of a member of staff of the school or bring the school into disrepute.

I’m genuinely curious - what other professions have this line in their contract? Do medical professionals have this? The corporate world?

I don't have an explicit contract however say I was an escort on the side and one of our clients found out I'm sure my boss wouldn't be pleased. I'm in the medical field. Personally Idc what this teacher did but if she worked for a Catholic school which someone mentioned I'm not surprised she got fired. They're pretty strict on their teachers and the students. Not like the old days where the nuns used to rap students on the knuckles but still.

[SoFloMom]

No one should be fired for legal activities they conduct on their personal time. However, Dolezal was pretty stupid to link to her OnlyFans account in her Instagram.

I feel this about instagram and Facebook: whatever your private settings if you don't want your boss, mama, priest or the cops to know don't post it. Tiktok might be a bit different since you can use a fake name but basically still be careful.

I don’t even have my full name on my FB because I’ve had students/parents try to find me before on there. Nooo thank you.

I actually did a whole reset on my FB and IG. Took down pics from college and old cringey posts from the early 2010s.

[Aletheia]

I don't give two figs about her activities outside of work as long as they don't impact the children directly.

I can only imagine some of the things my teachers might have been involved in, lol.

It isn't uncommon for certain professions to have a line in their contracts something similar to:

Avoid doing anything which could make the public doubt the motives or integrity of a member of staff of the school or bring the school into disrepute.

I’m genuinely curious - what other professions have this line in their contract? Do medical professionals have this? The corporate world?

People sponsored by a company to act as a brand spokesperson because of their personal character or achievements (what the spokesperson is seen by the public to stand for).