Mom Confessions

GMa4all wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:16 pm

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:52 pm

Lemons wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:15 am

You’ve all resorted to just making things up?

There’s no denying what Trump did so you attack the witnesses?

Partisans like Pelosi And Schiff? As opposed to partisans like Jim Jordan, and Nunes and the other one with the hostile look plastered on his face?

If you watched his testimony there can be zero other conclusion- he leaked to the person called a whistleblower.

The other is my opinion. I do not for a moment believe Schiff and Pelosi were not in on creating the whistleblower report.

He didn’t “ disgrace the uniform he’s wearing”.
And your bias against Schiff and Pelosi shows a lack of knowledge .
The fiction you spew here is disgraceful.

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:08 pm

GMa4all wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:16 pm

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:52 pm

If you watched his testimony there can be zero other conclusion- he leaked to the person called a whistleblower.

The other is my opinion. I do not for a moment believe Schiff and Pelosi were not in on creating the whistleblower report.

He didn’t “ disgrace the uniform he’s wearing”.
And your bias against Schiff and Pelosi shows a lack of knowledge .
The fiction you spew here is disgraceful.

You make me laugh Libby.
Yesterday you say I’m stalking and harassing you and to for you. Today you quote me and say my opinion is biased and disgraceful.

Oh, Michelle Obama is really a guy with a big ole cock. And Epstein didn’t kill himself, the Clinton’s were behind the plot.

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:15 pm

Lemons wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 7:15 pm

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:52 pm

If you watched his testimony there can be zero other conclusion- he leaked to the person called a whistleblower.

The other is my opinion. I do not for a moment believe Schiff and Pelosi were not in on creating the whistleblower report.

I don’t know. I was too busy listening to the evidence showing a chain of corruption running from Trump to Giuliani to Pompeo to others. Devin Nunes is now involved in looking for dirt on an opponent. (Note how no dirt has come out because there is none. Shokin was fired for among other things, not investigating Burisma).

Too busy because your mind was twisting what you heard into damning evidence.

Lemons wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:51 pm

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:15 pm

Lemons wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 7:15 pm

I don’t know. I was too busy listening to the evidence showing a chain of corruption running from Trump to Giuliani to Pompeo to others. Devin Nunes is now involved in looking for dirt on an opponent. (Note how no dirt has come out because there is none. Shokin was fired for among other things, not investigating Burisma).

Too busy because your mind was twisting what you heard into damning evidence.

I’m looking at the facts, first and most important. The credibility of the people, the timeline, what makes sense, what doesn’t.

Biden’s son joined Burisma, a company that appeared to have a corrupt CEO, zlochevsky, in 2014.

Viktor Shokin was appointed top prosecutor in the spring of 2015 and vowed to investigate Burisma for corruption.

By the fall of 2015 it was clear that Shokin wasn’t investigating anything. He was fired in the spring of 2016 with pushes from Biden, IMF, UK, and others.

A subsequent prosecutor cleared Burisma CEO Zlochevsky of any wrong doing.

So tell us, what are the Republicans investigating exactly? And if there were so concerned about this, why wait three years before investigating? Simple questions.

Lemons wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:51 pm

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:15 pm

Lemons wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 7:15 pm

I don’t know. I was too busy listening to the evidence showing a chain of corruption running from Trump to Giuliani to Pompeo to others. Devin Nunes is now involved in looking for dirt on an opponent. (Note how no dirt has come out because there is none. Shokin was fired for among other things, not investigating Burisma).

Too busy because your mind was twisting what you heard into damning evidence.

I’m looking at the facts, first and most important. The credibility of the people, the timeline, what makes sense, what doesn’t.

Biden’s son joined Burisma, a company that appeared to have a corrupt CEO, zlochevsky, in 2014.

Viktor Shokin was appointed top prosecutor in the spring of 2015 and vowed to investigate Burisma for corruption.

By the fall of 2015 it was clear that Shokin wasn’t investigating anything. He was fired in the spring of 2016 with pushes from Biden, IMF, UK, and others.

A subsequent prosecutor cleared Burisma CEO Zlochevsky of any wrong doing.

So tell us, what are the Republicans investigating exactly? And if there were so concerned about this, why wait three years before investigating? Simple questions.

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2019 2:10 pm

Lemons wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 8:51 pm

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:15 pm

Too busy because your mind was twisting what you heard into damning evidence.

I’m looking at the facts, first and most important. The credibility of the people, the timeline, what makes sense, what doesn’t.

Biden’s son joined Burisma, a company that appeared to have a corrupt CEO, zlochevsky, in 2014.

Viktor Shokin was appointed top prosecutor in the spring of 2015 and vowed to investigate Burisma for corruption.

By the fall of 2015 it was clear that Shokin wasn’t investigating anything. He was fired in the spring of 2016 with pushes from Biden, IMF, UK, and others.

A subsequent prosecutor cleared Burisma CEO Zlochevsky of any wrong doing.

So tell us, what are the Republicans investigating exactly? And if there were so concerned about this, why wait three years before investigating? Simple questions.

I think the new President won on fighting corruption in Ukraine both from businesses as well as within the government. The former President seemed pretty lackluster in investigating corruption. Maybe that had something to do with it.