Not true unless you don't believe in the working mechanism of the EC.
It's official: Hillary suffers from dementia
Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:58 pmTechnicalities??ReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 4:14 pm More Americans voted for her than for him.
Technicalities allowed him to become president, but she beat his ass when it came to American voters.
You mean like the long standing rules of our elections?
That technicality?
The fact is - she lost. She did not beat him in the election. She lost. Nothing will change that fact.
She won more votes than he did. Millions more people wanted her as president than they wanted Trump. Nothing will change that fact.
- KnotaDinghy
- Regent
- Posts: 4425
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:43 pm
- Location: Philly suburbs
AnnieArk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:19 pmKnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:58 pmTechnicalities??ReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 4:14 pm More Americans voted for her than for him.
Technicalities allowed him to become president, but she beat his ass when it came to American voters.
You mean like the long standing rules of our elections?
That technicality?
The fact is - she lost. She did not beat him in the election. She lost. Nothing will change that fact.
She won more votes than he did. Millions more people wanted her as president than they wanted Trump. Nothing will change that fact.
I’ll make this as simple as possible.
If this is true and more people voted in more election districts for her, she would be in the White House today. Our election system is based on the winning of electors by district.
Our process can be easily found with a simple Google search. Especially since this is taught in 5th grade.
“You’re either on drugs or retarded.
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
- ReadingRainbow
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 11:01 am
Since we’re looking into it and all... Does our electoral college work the way the founding fathers intended it to work?KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:35 pmAnnieArk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:19 pmKnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:58 pm
Technicalities??
You mean like the long standing rules of our elections?
That technicality?
The fact is - she lost. She did not beat him in the election. She lost. Nothing will change that fact.
She won more votes than he did. Millions more people wanted her as president than they wanted Trump. Nothing will change that fact.
I’ll make this as simple as possible.
If this is true and more people voted in more election districts for her, she would be in the White House today. Our election system is based on the winning of electors by district.
Our process can be easily found with a simple Google search. Especially since this is taught in 5th grade.
- KnotaDinghy
- Regent
- Posts: 4425
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:43 pm
- Location: Philly suburbs
YesReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:39 pmSince we’re looking into it and all... Does our electoral college work the way the founding fathers intended it to work?KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:35 pm
I’ll make this as simple as possible.
If this is true and more people voted in more election districts for her, she would be in the White House today. Our election system is based on the winning of electors by district.
Our process can be easily found with a simple Google search. Especially since this is taught in 5th grade.
“You’re either on drugs or retarded.
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:35 pmAnnieArk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:19 pmKnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:58 pm
Technicalities??
You mean like the long standing rules of our elections?
That technicality?
The fact is - she lost. She did not beat him in the election. She lost. Nothing will change that fact.
She won more votes than he did. Millions more people wanted her as president than they wanted Trump. Nothing will change that fact.
I’ll make this as simple as possible.
If this is true and more people voted in more election districts for her, she would be in the White House today. Our election system is based on the winning of electors by district.
Our process can be easily found with a simple Google search. Especially since this is taught in 5th grade.
LOL. You need to do some research. This wasn't the first time a candidate won the popular vote but lost the electoral college. The system is flawed. The electoral college doesn't belong in a modern democracy. It needs to go.
- ReadingRainbow
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 11:01 am
***Jeopardy buzz***KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:41 pmYesReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:39 pmSince we’re looking into it and all... Does our electoral college work the way the founding fathers intended it to work?KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:35 pm
I’ll make this as simple as possible.
If this is true and more people voted in more election districts for her, she would be in the White House today. Our election system is based on the winning of electors by district.
Our process can be easily found with a simple Google search. Especially since this is taught in 5th grade.
I’m sorry, the correct answer was “ No, there have been many changes in who is allowed to vote, how votes are counted, and even as recently as July of this year some states have adopted the NPVIC that will dramatically affect how the electoral college elects the president and Vice President in the future”
- KnotaDinghy
- Regent
- Posts: 4425
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:43 pm
- Location: Philly suburbs
LolAnnieArk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:46 pmKnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:35 pm
I’ll make this as simple as possible.
If this is true and more people voted in more election districts for her, she would be in the White House today. Our election system is based on the winning of electors by district.
Our process can be easily found with a simple Google search. Especially since this is taught in 5th grade.
LOL. You need to do some research. This wasn't the first time a candidate won the popular vote but lost the electoral college. The system is flawed. The electoral college doesn't belong in a modern democracy. It needs to go.
That’s funny
“You’re either on drugs or retarded.
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
- sockpuppet
- Viscountess
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 9:56 pm
From your link:morgan wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 4:06 pm Hillary Clinton muses about 2020 'rematch' against Trump: 'I can beat him again'
https://www.foxnews.com/media/hillary-c ... mp-rematch
" . . . after he[Trump] goaded Clinton to run for the White House again." She was being sarcastic. duh