It's official: Hillary suffers from dementia
Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
- morgan
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 7544
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:52 am
Beating him would literally translate into winning which would literally translate into her being the president. That’s really weird……
KAG
Mean Girl
Mean Girl
-
- Regent
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 10:56 pm
Do you feel that the primaries are "rigged" the same way the general election is "rigged"? It's basically the same. People vote in a primary to choose the nominee. Millions of votes in primaries "don't count" but nobody seems to have a problem with that.ReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 7:01 pmYeah... technicalities. The fact that even though someone can overwhelmingly win more votes by millions of people, they lose based on not getting the “right” votes from the right people.KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 6:58 pmTechnicalities??ReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 4:14 pm More Americans voted for her than for him.
Technicalities allowed him to become president, but she beat his ass when it came to American voters.
You mean like the long standing rules of our elections?
That technicality?
The fact is - she lost. She did not beat him in the election. She lost. Nothing will change that fact.
Expand your thinking
It’s possible to disagree with an article and not respond with a personal attack you know.
Try it.
It’s possible to disagree with an article and not respond with a personal attack you know.
Try it.
- KnotaDinghy
- Regent
- Posts: 4425
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:43 pm
- Location: Philly suburbs
Poll data worked out well for you last time, did they?msb64 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 7:28 pm New Hampshire, Florida, Minnesota, Florida, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania.
Trump won these states with less than 2% margin. He's current down - way down - in polling against every democratic candidate in almost all of these states. I imagine if the election were held tomorrow, Clinton would win. There's a lot of "buyers remorse".
That being said, I don't want to see her run again unless it's as VP.
“You’re either on drugs or retarded.
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
- KnotaDinghy
- Regent
- Posts: 4425
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:43 pm
- Location: Philly suburbs
Our election system does not include a participation trophy for losing. The “popular vote” has zero definition or meaning in our system.
How we elect Presidents is well documented. Do you need some links to learn about it?
“You’re either on drugs or retarded.
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
Trump won those battleground states within the margin of polling. I'm not saying that poll data is totally accurate (but damn Trump seems to like it) however Trump is decidedly more unpopular now than he was during the 2016 election. Do you think he could win against Clinton in a current race? If so, what are you basing that conclusion?KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:36 pmPoll data worked out well for you last time, did they?msb64 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 7:28 pm New Hampshire, Florida, Minnesota, Florida, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania.
Trump won these states with less than 2% margin. He's current down - way down - in polling against every democratic candidate in almost all of these states. I imagine if the election were held tomorrow, Clinton would win. There's a lot of "buyers remorse".
That being said, I don't want to see her run again unless it's as VP.
- KnotaDinghy
- Regent
- Posts: 4425
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:43 pm
- Location: Philly suburbs
He wasn’t that popular in the 2016 election. There was a definite anti-HRC vote. He was unknown but supported the GOP agenda.msb64 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:43 pmTrump won those battleground states within the margin of polling. I'm not saying that poll data is totally accurate (but damn Trump seems to like it) however Trump is decidedly more unpopular now than he was during the 2016 election. Do you think he could win against Clinton in a current race? If so, what are you basing that conclusion?KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:36 pmPoll data worked out well for you last time, did they?msb64 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 7:28 pm New Hampshire, Florida, Minnesota, Florida, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania.
Trump won these states with less than 2% margin. He's current down - way down - in polling against every democratic candidate in almost all of these states. I imagine if the election were held tomorrow, Clinton would win. There's a lot of "buyers remorse".
That being said, I don't want to see her run again unless it's as VP.
Yes, he would win easily against her. At this point he’s solidified a base. His supporters believe in him because he’s done a lot of what he said he would do. And he hasn’t changed. The more democrats target him, the more his base is solid and grows. You won’t see that in polls.
“You’re either on drugs or retarded.
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
Do you feel that his base is sold and growing? What do you base this on?KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:51 pmHe wasn’t that popular in the 2016 election. There was a definite anti-HRC vote. He was unknown but supported the GOP agenda.msb64 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:43 pmTrump won those battleground states within the margin of polling. I'm not saying that poll data is totally accurate (but damn Trump seems to like it) however Trump is decidedly more unpopular now than he was during the 2016 election. Do you think he could win against Clinton in a current race? If so, what are you basing that conclusion?
Yes, he would win easily against her. At this point he’s solidified a base. His supporters believe in him because he’s done a lot of what he said he would do. And he hasn’t changed. The more democrats target him, the more his base is solid and grows. You won’t see that in polls.
-
- Princess
- Posts: 11473
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2018 5:53 pm
I am fully aware, I am simply saying what she said is not false. Get over it.KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:39 pmOur election system does not include a participation trophy for losing. The “popular vote” has zero definition or meaning in our system.
How we elect Presidents is well documented. Do you need some links to learn about it?
- KnotaDinghy
- Regent
- Posts: 4425
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 2:43 pm
- Location: Philly suburbs
Solid?msb64 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:53 pmDo you feel that his base is sold and growing? What do you base this on?KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:51 pmHe wasn’t that popular in the 2016 election. There was a definite anti-HRC vote. He was unknown but supported the GOP agenda.msb64 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:43 pm
Trump won those battleground states within the margin of polling. I'm not saying that poll data is totally accurate (but damn Trump seems to like it) however Trump is decidedly more unpopular now than he was during the 2016 election. Do you think he could win against Clinton in a current race? If so, what are you basing that conclusion?
Yes, he would win easily against her. At this point he’s solidified a base. His supporters believe in him because he’s done a lot of what he said he would do. And he hasn’t changed. The more democrats target him, the more his base is solid and grows. You won’t see that in polls.
Yes I do - that’s why I said that.
Growing? Yes.
More and more I see campaign signs - which were almost non-existent in 2016. Last week driving from VA to PA, I was pleased to see the Trump 2020 signs throughout Northern VA and the Baltimore area. At rallies I see more groups than before.
I spend a lot of time with really wealthy people who have been pro-Trump but I’ve started seeing more and more outward support from people of different economics and from diverse ethnicities.
I know that’s all anecdotal, but it’s my experience from traveling for work. And I travel a lot.
“You’re either on drugs or retarded.
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp
Nobody posts the crap you post unless they’re abnormal.” - derp