Oh, sorry. Why are you so angry?Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:45 pmI'm not either of the anons you were conversing with. Try again Sherlock.HanSolo wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:44 pmI moved on s few hours ago. You already quoted and responded to this.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:40 pm
Fetus isn't born yet so NOPE, not infantcide. Let's face facts though since this is a bullshit post anyhow, that shit would never happen.You know it, I know it, OP knows it. Moving on.
Old days on cafemom on the topic of abortion.
- HanSolo
- Duchess
- Posts: 1974
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:59 pm
- Baconqueen13
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 6829
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 12:10 am
- Location: In Sanity
Oh so you're going that route? The route of assuming my emotional state based on a rather blase' comment because it disagrees with your stance when you can't dictate tone or sarcasm over the written word to try to continue an argument you already lost? Okay then, you have fun with that.HanSolo wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:49 pmOh, sorry. Why are you so angry?Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:45 pmI'm not either of the anons you were conversing with. Try again Sherlock.
- HanSolo
- Duchess
- Posts: 1974
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:59 pm
Well, you say that killing a viable life is a woman’s choice, so anything else you say to me is gibberish. You seem angry in tone.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:54 pmOh so you're going that route? The route of assuming my emotional state based on a rather blase' comment because it disagrees with your stance when you can't dictate tone or sarcasm over the written word to try to continue an argument you already lost? Okay then, you have fun with that.HanSolo wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:49 pmOh, sorry. Why are you so angry?Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:45 pm
I'm not either of the anons you were conversing with. Try again Sherlock.
- AllofFive19
- Regent
- Posts: 3801
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 10:17 am
Well someone obviously isn't biased at all.Anonymous 1 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:44 pm Remember when some of you used to be pro-abortion but would say the sooner you kill the baby the better? Well, now they are pushing to kill babies for any reason, at any time have you changed your tune? Do you now accept and support babies being killed right up until the very end of pregnancy or do you have an ounce of decency left in you and say kill it asap only?
“Don’t let yesterday take up too much of today.” – Will Rogers
- Baconqueen13
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 6829
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 12:10 am
- Location: In Sanity
No dear, it's you that is angry because I'm not falling into your trap. Congrats you are morally superior. Here's a cookie and a trophy. Bye nowHanSolo wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:01 pmWell, you say that killing a viable life is a woman’s choice, so anything else you say to me is gibberish. You seem angry in tone.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:54 pmOh so you're going that route? The route of assuming my emotional state based on a rather blase' comment because it disagrees with your stance when you can't dictate tone or sarcasm over the written word to try to continue an argument you already lost? Okay then, you have fun with that.
- HanSolo
- Duchess
- Posts: 1974
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:59 pm
Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:04 pmNo dear, it's you that is angry because I'm not falling into your trap. Congrats you are morally superior. Here's a cookie and a trophy. Bye nowHanSolo wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:01 pmWell, you say that killing a viable life is a woman’s choice, so anything else you say to me is gibberish. You seem angry in tone.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:54 pm
Oh so you're going that route? The route of assuming my emotional state based on a rather blase' comment because it disagrees with your stance when you can't dictate tone or sarcasm over the written word to try to continue an argument you already lost? Okay then, you have fun with that.
Murder is a legal term. Abortion isn’t illegal, ergo it can’t be murder.
Dylexsmommy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:16 pm I've never supported abortion. I believe its murder. But i also believe in a womans right to choose.
Thats all. Only her right to choose.
That’s such logical fallacy. Women aren’t having full-term abortions just because. It’s an illogical argument.
HanSolo wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:01 pmWell, you say that killing a viable life is a woman’s choice, so anything else you say to me is gibberish. You seem angry in tone.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:54 pmOh so you're going that route? The route of assuming my emotional state based on a rather blase' comment because it disagrees with your stance when you can't dictate tone or sarcasm over the written word to try to continue an argument you already lost? Okay then, you have fun with that.
- HanSolo
- Duchess
- Posts: 1974
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:59 pm
Lol, well, it is possible for them to, and that’s what she did say. She supports the right for a woman to go in the day before her due date and abort. You don’t think that there are maniac doctors who wouldn’t deem a woman mentally unable to handle it and perform the medically necessary procedure? What world are you living in? It’s not an argument. It’s what she said.Anonymous 13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:50 pm That’s such logical fallacy. Women aren’t having full-term abortions just because. It’s an illogical argument.
HanSolo wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:01 pmWell, you say that killing a viable life is a woman’s choice, so anything else you say to me is gibberish. You seem angry in tone.Baconqueen13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:54 pm
Oh so you're going that route? The route of assuming my emotional state based on a rather blase' comment because it disagrees with your stance when you can't dictate tone or sarcasm over the written word to try to continue an argument you already lost? Okay then, you have fun with that.
- Baconqueen13
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 6829
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 12:10 am
- Location: In Sanity
My supporting of a woman's rights to do what she wishes with her body still does not change the fact that you are trying to make the claim based on a logical fallacy. Of course I would give a ridiculous answer to an equally ridiculously presented situation. I'm a pragmatist and realist. I don't react to knee jerk fallacies. A woman going in and aborting a fetus the day before her due date is not realistic and does not actually occur. But would I support it anyways even though it medically has never occurred and would never occur in the medical field? Sure, because until the second that fetus is removed from the woman's body it is technically a parasite living within it's host and thus it is the host's choice what to do with it.HanSolo wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:09 pmLol, well, it is possible for them to, and that’s what she did say. She supports the right for a woman to go in the day before her due date and abort. You don’t think that there are maniac doctors who wouldn’t deem a woman mentally unable to handle it and perform the medically necessary procedure? What world are you living in? It’s not an argument. It’s what she said.Anonymous 13 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:50 pm That’s such logical fallacy. Women aren’t having full-term abortions just because. It’s an illogical argument.