A community where moms are free to confess and share anything
https://www.momconfessions.net/
morgan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:04 am Actually it's not his 2nd amendment right - he was a felon who had the weapons illegally. He had weapons that are already considered illegal on their own. This is just an example of how criminals do not follow the laws and will find a way to obtain weapons. Always.
Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:47 am That’s the dumbest argument ever.
So let’s not have laws at all, since criminals will always find ways to break them. We might as way go easy on rape, because someone will find a way to do it anyway.
If anything, this shows that gun control is so lax that it’s so easy to find a whole arsenal of illegal ones. If laws were stronger, he probably wouldn’t find it so easy to have all those guns, not to mention grenades.
When “gun control laws” really is just a background check on records, it’s so easy for everybody to get one. It’s not that hard to jump that little hurdle. If gun control meant stricter background checks, including checking those people close to the one requesting permission, if there was a ban on assault weapons, if there was an inspection at the person’s property before granting permission, then it would also make it harder for criminals to get their hands on guns.
morgan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:04 am Actually it's not his 2nd amendment right - he was a felon who had the weapons illegally. He had weapons that are already considered illegal on their own. This is just an example of how criminals do not follow the laws and will find a way to obtain weapons. Always.
Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:47 am That’s the dumbest argument ever.
So let’s not have laws at all, since criminals will always find ways to break them. We might as way go easy on rape, because someone will find a way to do it anyway.
If anything, this shows that gun control is so lax that it’s so easy to find a whole arsenal of illegal ones. If laws were stronger, he probably wouldn’t find it so easy to have all those guns, not to mention grenades.
When “gun control laws” really is just a background check on records, it’s so easy for everybody to get one. It’s not that hard to jump that little hurdle. If gun control meant stricter background checks, including checking those people close to the one requesting permission, if there was a ban on assault weapons, if there was an inspection at the person’s property before granting permission, then it would also make it harder for criminals to get their hands on guns.
morgan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:04 am Actually it's not his 2nd amendment right - he was a felon who had the weapons illegally. He had weapons that are already considered illegal on their own. This is just an example of how criminals do not follow the laws and will find a way to obtain weapons. Always.
ReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 11:02 am It’s insane how many people want anarchy instead of laws.Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:47 am That’s the dumbest argument ever.
So let’s not have laws at all, since criminals will always find ways to break them. We might as way go easy on rape, because someone will find a way to do it anyway.
If anything, this shows that gun control is so lax that it’s so easy to find a whole arsenal of illegal ones. If laws were stronger, he probably wouldn’t find it so easy to have all those guns, not to mention grenades.
When “gun control laws” really is just a background check on records, it’s so easy for everybody to get one. It’s not that hard to jump that little hurdle. If gun control meant stricter background checks, including checking those people close to the one requesting permission, if there was a ban on assault weapons, if there was an inspection at the person’s property before granting permission, then it would also make it harder for criminals to get their hands on guns.
morgan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:04 am Actually it's not his 2nd amendment right - he was a felon who had the weapons illegally. He had weapons that are already considered illegal on their own. This is just an example of how criminals do not follow the laws and will find a way to obtain weapons. Always.
A felon in possession of a firearm? Imagine that!! I guess he didn't give a shit about the laws in New Jersey. Most criminals don't care about obeying society's laws.morgan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:04 am Actually it's not his 2nd amendment right - he was a felon who had the weapons illegally. He had weapons that are already considered illegal on their own. This is just an example of how criminals do not follow the laws and will find a way to obtain weapons. Always.
Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 1:38 pm Hypocritical anarchy, probably. I’m sure that if we suggested that since people manage to sneak in the country, anyway, that we may as well just open the borders and let everyone in, no questions asked, they’ll flip over it and see the dumbness of that argument. Seriously, if illegal immigrants already find ways to get in, why make it harder?
ReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 11:02 am It’s insane how many people want anarchy instead of laws.Momto2boys973 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:47 am That’s the dumbest argument ever.
So let’s not have laws at all, since criminals will always find ways to break them. We might as way go easy on rape, because someone will find a way to do it anyway.
If anything, this shows that gun control is so lax that it’s so easy to find a whole arsenal of illegal ones. If laws were stronger, he probably wouldn’t find it so easy to have all those guns, not to mention grenades.
When “gun control laws” really is just a background check on records, it’s so easy for everybody to get one. It’s not that hard to jump that little hurdle. If gun control meant stricter background checks, including checking those people close to the one requesting permission, if there was a ban on assault weapons, if there was an inspection at the person’s property before granting permission, then it would also make it harder for criminals to get their hands on guns.
Lexy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 1:56 pmA felon in possession of a firearm? Imagine that!! I guess he didn't give a shit about the laws in New Jersey. Most criminals don't care about obeying society's laws.morgan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:04 am Actually it's not his 2nd amendment right - he was a felon who had the weapons illegally. He had weapons that are already considered illegal on their own. This is just an example of how criminals do not follow the laws and will find a way to obtain weapons. Always.
Notice how passionately I was attacked by my usual fanbase I'm getting for pointing out to Libby that he was in no way practicing any 2nd amendment right?Lexy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 1:56 pmA felon in possession of a firearm? Imagine that!! I guess he didn't give a shit about the laws in New Jersey. Most criminals don't care about obeying society's laws.morgan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:04 am Actually it's not his 2nd amendment right - he was a felon who had the weapons illegally. He had weapons that are already considered illegal on their own. This is just an example of how criminals do not follow the laws and will find a way to obtain weapons. Always.