Re: Why impeaching Trump is “ worth it”.
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 9:42 pm
A community where moms are free to confess and share anything
https://www.momconfessions.net/
But banging interns in the Oval Office is not why Clinton was impeached.MysticDreamer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 8:41 pmThere was solid evidence that would have been enough to impeach Nixon. There was a tape recording of him talking about the wiretap or something. It has been so long since Watergate, my memory is fuzzy. I thought it was stupid to impeach Clinton for banging interns in the Oval Office. They don't have anything solid for Trump, so yes it would be a waste of time. Lack of qualifications and being a jackass is not an impeachable offense.
He lied. That’s why.29again wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:17 pmBut banging interns in the Oval Office is not why Clinton was impeached.MysticDreamer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 8:41 pmThere was solid evidence that would have been enough to impeach Nixon. There was a tape recording of him talking about the wiretap or something. It has been so long since Watergate, my memory is fuzzy. I thought it was stupid to impeach Clinton for banging interns in the Oval Office. They don't have anything solid for Trump, so yes it would be a waste of time. Lack of qualifications and being a jackass is not an impeachable offense.
No kidding? Can you share with the group when and what the outcome was when Trump was found guilty of perjury and of obstruction of justice?Libbylu2 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:28 pmHe lied. That’s why.29again wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:17 pmBut banging interns in the Oval Office is not why Clinton was impeached.MysticDreamer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 8:41 pm
There was solid evidence that would have been enough to impeach Nixon. There was a tape recording of him talking about the wiretap or something. It has been so long since Watergate, my memory is fuzzy. I thought it was stupid to impeach Clinton for banging interns in the Oval Office. They don't have anything solid for Trump, so yes it would be a waste of time. Lack of qualifications and being a jackass is not an impeachable offense.
Big deal. And charges were eventually dropped.
Trump has told hundreds of lies, committed tax fraud, has been accused of sexual misconduct by dozens of women, refuses to submit his tax returns which indicates he has a lot to hide and a lot more.
Clinton lied to the investigators.Libbylu2 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:28 pmHe lied. That’s why.29again wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:17 pmBut banging interns in the Oval Office is not why Clinton was impeached.MysticDreamer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 8:41 pm
There was solid evidence that would have been enough to impeach Nixon. There was a tape recording of him talking about the wiretap or something. It has been so long since Watergate, my memory is fuzzy. I thought it was stupid to impeach Clinton for banging interns in the Oval Office. They don't have anything solid for Trump, so yes it would be a waste of time. Lack of qualifications and being a jackass is not an impeachable offense.
Big deal. And charges were eventually dropped.
Trump has told hundreds of lies, committed tax fraud, has been accused of sexual misconduct by dozens of women, refuses to submit his tax returns which indicates he has a lot to hide and a lot more.
I’m not fascinated with His Money but the people who investigate him are , along with other of his unusual actions that we haven’t seen from past presidents.29again wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:25 amClinton lied to the investigators.Libbylu2 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:28 pmHe lied. That’s why.
Big deal. And charges were eventually dropped.
Trump has told hundreds of lies, committed tax fraud, has been accused of sexual misconduct by dozens of women, refuses to submit his tax returns which indicates he has a lot to hide and a lot more.
Yes, a big deal.
You know for a fact that Trump committed tax fraud? What proof do you have, and why have you not contacted the authorities? Accusations are just that, accusations. Anyone can do that.
What law says that tax returns have to be submitted to the public? Why does refusal indicate anything more than a desire for privacy? You sure as hell won't ever get to see my tax returns, nor will anyone else. I really don't get this fascination with other peoples money that some have.
Do you really believe the legal authorities that may be investigating him don’t have access to his tax documents? Or do you mean the self appointed civilian wannabe “reporters”. The people who need access can get it. What makes you believe they can’t?Libbylu2 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:26 amI’m not fascinated with His Money but the people who investigate him are , along with other of his unusual actions that we haven’t seen from past presidents.29again wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:25 amClinton lied to the investigators.Libbylu2 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:28 pm
He lied. That’s why.
Big deal. And charges were eventually dropped.
Trump has told hundreds of lies, committed tax fraud, has been accused of sexual misconduct by dozens of women, refuses to submit his tax returns which indicates he has a lot to hide and a lot more.
Yes, a big deal.
You know for a fact that Trump committed tax fraud? What proof do you have, and why have you not contacted the authorities? Accusations are just that, accusations. Anyone can do that.
What law says that tax returns have to be submitted to the public? Why does refusal indicate anything more than a desire for privacy? You sure as hell won't ever get to see my tax returns, nor will anyone else. I really don't get this fascination with other peoples money that some have.
You Trump fans excuse everything he has done or is doing. Why does he get a free pass but none of the democrats did or do? It’s always ...Obama, Hillary...
I can’t say if they have access to his tax returns or if they don’t.Poietes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:10 amDo you really believe the legal authorities that may be investigating him don’t have access to his tax documents? Or do you mean the self appointed civilian wannabe “reporters”. The people who need access can get it. What makes you believe they can’t?Libbylu2 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:26 amI’m not fascinated with His Money but the people who investigate him are , along with other of his unusual actions that we haven’t seen from past presidents.29again wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:25 am
Clinton lied to the investigators.
Yes, a big deal.
You know for a fact that Trump committed tax fraud? What proof do you have, and why have you not contacted the authorities? Accusations are just that, accusations. Anyone can do that.
What law says that tax returns have to be submitted to the public? Why does refusal indicate anything more than a desire for privacy? You sure as hell won't ever get to see my tax returns, nor will anyone else. I really don't get this fascination with other peoples money that some have.
You Trump fans excuse everything he has done or is doing. Why does he get a free pass but none of the democrats did or do? It’s always ...Obama, Hillary...
What are the exact charges that should be brought and what proof do you have? I’m not a Trump fan at all but you are throwing out a lot of absolute statements and I haven’t seen you present any proof to back them up.Libbylu2 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:47 amI can’t say if they have access to his tax returns or if they don’t.Poietes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:10 amDo you really believe the legal authorities that may be investigating him don’t have access to his tax documents? Or do you mean the self appointed civilian wannabe “reporters”. The people who need access can get it. What makes you believe they can’t?Libbylu2 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:26 am
I’m not fascinated with His Money but the people who investigate him are , along with other of his unusual actions that we haven’t seen from past presidents.
And aside from misdeeds before or during his presidency, the trump family is being charged for tax fraud by the state of New York.
You Trump fans excuse everything he has done or is doing. Why does he get a free pass but none of the democrats did or do? It’s always ...Obama, Hillary...
I’m just saying that Trump gets a free pass from his fans.
And he’s guilty of things that presidents can be prosecuted for.
If you don’t know that, it’s just that you’re in denial!
They have been published and discussed and argued about already for months and monthsPoietes wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:58 amWhat are the exact charges that should be brought and what proof do you have? I’m not a Trump fan at all but you are throwing out a lot of absolute statements and I haven’t seen you present any proof to back them up.