He was physically abused.ReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:14 pmYou said he had issues with physical assault, right?Anonymous 1 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:00 pmSince I've seen a lot of "protect" statements. What makes you believe he'd be dangerous ?
Would you?
- ReadingRainbow
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 11:01 am
Oh, sorry. I read it as though he was the abusive one.Anonymous 1 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:18 pmHe was physically abused.ReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:14 pmYou said he had issues with physical assault, right?Anonymous 1 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:00 pm
Since I've seen a lot of "protect" statements. What makes you believe he'd be dangerous ?
-
- Regent
- Posts: 4963
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:05 am
If you meant that he was a victim of physical abuse you need to edit your OP. Is he a victim with everything else or is he a perpetrator. In my case it wouldnt matter. It would be a hard freaking no. Whether by fostering from the state or a kinship placement. It would still be no. My nuclear family comes firsrAnonymous 1 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:18 pmHe was physically abused.ReadingRainbow wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:14 pmYou said he had issues with physical assault, right?Anonymous 1 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:00 pm
Since I've seen a lot of "protect" statements. What makes you believe he'd be dangerous ?