Mom Confessions

morgan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 5:12 pm So just to be clear - we are no longer allowed to comment on the shady source of an article? So if I post something from Breitbart, if anyone comments that Breitbart is an unreliable source, that is a punishable offense? If someone posts an article that's a year old, and claims it's a current event, and I point out that it's no longer a current event, that's a punishable offense?

Just clarifying.

Thanks

12skipafew wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:35 pm You can comment on the date of an article without resorting to insults which is why you were quoted in that instance. It had less to do with your comment about the date or more the sentence after you mentioned the date. If you have any other questions, feel free to pm me and I will elaborate more on exactly what you did to be quoted.

morgan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 5:12 pm So just to be clear - we are no longer allowed to comment on the shady source of an article? So if I post something from Breitbart, if anyone comments that Breitbart is an unreliable source, that is a punishable offense? If someone posts an article that's a year old, and claims it's a current event, and I point out that it's no longer a current event, that's a punishable offense?

Just clarifying.

Thanks

morgan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 7:38 pm You mean specifically when I said "cant you find a more current article about Trump that triggers you?"

That was against the rules and is a punishable offense? Again, I'm just trying to understand what you think qualifies as "off topic" or "personal attack". I suppose since me saying that "Trump triggers you" is now against the rules, I can go ahead and safely assume when someone calls me or anyone else a "Trumpette" is also against the rules and a punishable offense?

Like I said, I think you're going down a slippery slope here, Skip.

12skipafew wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:35 pm You can comment on the date of an article without resorting to insults which is why you were quoted in that instance. It had less to do with your comment about the date or more the sentence after you mentioned the date. If you have any other questions, feel free to pm me and I will elaborate more on exactly what you did to be quoted.

morgan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 5:12 pm So just to be clear - we are no longer allowed to comment on the shady source of an article? So if I post something from Breitbart, if anyone comments that Breitbart is an unreliable source, that is a punishable offense? If someone posts an article that's a year old, and claims it's a current event, and I point out that it's no longer a current event, that's a punishable offense?

Just clarifying.

Thanks