CONFIRMED: British Spy Testifies That Hillary Paid Him to Help Challenge Trump Victory

[TheQueenOfEverything]

Also if you’re genuinely interested in differentiating between sources, this evaluation chart is handy and accurate (except the hill, not sure how that ended up so far right, and politico probably belongs closer to the center). Click to enlarge so you can read the tiny print.

8E19A0BF-5EE3-41E2-8171-1191423A0607.jpegCF76985F-6BB0-4066-9331-F4763C86A6D7.jpeg6F64542B-04D1-49FC-8787-61BA3290F488.jpeg91BB0A59-6E48-4107-AB70-96F5F7B285B6.jpeg

I did not know what RT was, no. I did some research and since they are a very highly rated news service in 47 countries, a lot of them socialist countries, I am surprised that liberals wouldn’t trust them.

My sources are not far right. Most people would consider them reputable.

I’m pretty sure it was you who impied to me to look at the the “factual reporting” line and if that’s high then the bias doesn’t matter when I challenged one of your sources once. Not that I’m agruing the article I’m just curious on what is the standard for a “garbage source”? Can I start criticizing left bias sources without anyone getting butt hurt?

[Poietes]

Read the whole comment thread. She specifically said her sources weren’t far right sources. All but one of them are, and even that one is still right wing.. she also said they are reputable, but only one of them has a high factual rating and it isn’t even the same one as the one that’s only pretty right wing instead of far right.

You really need to quit trying to find this “gotcha” moment with me; it’s not going to happen. Nobody is butthurt about anything. Criticize whatever you want, I’m not your mommy. Just don’t expect me to not point out your hypocrisy & undeniably right wing bias, or believe you when you try to pretend you are a moderate

8E19A0BF-5EE3-41E2-8171-1191423A0607.jpegCF76985F-6BB0-4066-9331-F4763C86A6D7.jpeg6F64542B-04D1-49FC-8787-61BA3290F488.jpeg91BB0A59-6E48-4107-AB70-96F5F7B285B6.jpeg

I’m pretty sure it was you who impied to me to look at the the “factual reporting” line and if that’s high then the bias doesn’t matter when I challenged one of your sources once. Not that I’m agruing the article I’m just curious on what is the standard for a “garbage source”? Can I start criticizing left bias sources without anyone getting butt hurt?

lmao that’s a great rant. Thanks for the laugh.

[TheQueenOfEverything]

Now THAT is a stellar example of a non-response. Hey, you know, when you can’t think of anything to say, it really is okay to just... not say anything.

Read the whole comment thread. She specifically said her sources weren’t far right sources. All but one of them are, and even that one is still right wing.. she also said they are reputable, but only one of them has a high factual rating and it isn’t even the same one as the one that’s only pretty right wing instead of far right.

You really need to quit trying to find this “gotcha” moment with me; it’s not going to happen. Nobody is butthurt about anything. Criticize whatever you want, I’m not your mommy. Just don’t expect me to not point out your hypocrisy & undeniably right wing bias, or believe you when you try to pretend you are a moderate

I’m pretty sure it was you who impied to me to look at the the “factual reporting” line and if that’s high then the bias doesn’t matter when I challenged one of your sources once. Not that I’m agruing the article I’m just curious on what is the standard for a “garbage source”? Can I start criticizing left bias sources without anyone getting butt hurt?

lmao that’s a great rant. Thanks for the laugh.

[Poietes]

Now THAT is a stellar example of a non-response. Hey, you know, when you can’t think of anything to say, it really is okay to just... not say anything.

Read the whole comment thread. She specifically said her sources weren’t far right sources. All but one of them are, and even that one is still right wing.. she also said they are reputable, but only one of them has a high factual rating and it isn’t even the same one as the one that’s only pretty right wing instead of far right.

You really need to quit trying to find this “gotcha” moment with me; it’s not going to happen. Nobody is butthurt about anything. Criticize whatever you want, I’m not your mommy. Just don’t expect me to not point out your hypocrisy & undeniably right wing bias, or believe you when you try to pretend you are a moderate

lmao that’s a great rant. Thanks for the laugh.

Keep it up, I’m getting a great giggle tonight! This is very entertaining! If there was an actual coherent point to respond to I might have more to say than a laugh but keep up the pointless ranting. I’m loving it!

[TheQueenOfEverything]

Okay, poietes.

Now THAT is a stellar example of a non-response. Hey, you know, when you can’t think of anything to say, it really is okay to just... not say anything.

lmao that’s a great rant. Thanks for the laugh.

Keep it up, I’m getting a great giggle tonight! This is very entertaining! If there was an actual coherent point to respond to I might have more to say than a laugh but keep up the pointless ranting. I’m loving it!

[Lemons]

Anti-Trump dossier author Christopher Steele has some news an honest media would love to report.

As we’ve all witnessed for a while now, the MSM isn’t on the level anymore.

Steele has now revealed that twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, along with the Democrat National Committee, paid him to help challenge the validity of the 2016 election if she lost.

Hillary and the DNC presumed Russia would’ve helped Trump, which is what they would have challenged.

Wasn’t Hillary the one who slammed Trump for saying he might contest the result of the race?




Get informed @ -



https://flagandcross.com/confirmed-brit ... p-victory/

How is Steele a spy? Did he forget to register too? And what is illegal about challenging how Trump won?