Three of your sources are absolutely far right and the other one is for other fools.DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 10:51 amI did not know what RT was, no. I did some research and since they are a very highly rated news service in 47 countries, a lot of them socialist countries, I am surprised that liberals wouldn’t trust them.CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 amShe asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT,DSamuels wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:31 pm
Is your google broken? I posted at least one in another post yesterday or the day before. Let’s see what I can find....
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washin ... eparing-t/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/townhall.c ... 3famp=true
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dailyc ... le-dossier
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com ... ussia/amp/
You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
My sources are not far right. Most people would consider them reputable.
CONFIRMED: British Spy Testifies That Hillary Paid Him to Help Challenge Trump Victory
Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
-
- Princess
- Posts: 22440
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm
306/232
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
-
- Princess
- Posts: 22440
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm
Three of your sources are absolutely far right and the other one is for other fools.DSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 10:51 amI did not know what RT was, no. I did some research and since they are a very highly rated news service in 47 countries, a lot of them socialist countries, I am surprised that liberals wouldn’t trust them.CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 amShe asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT,DSamuels wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:31 pm
Is your google broken? I posted at least one in another post yesterday or the day before. Let’s see what I can find....
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washin ... eparing-t/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/townhall.c ... 3famp=true
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dailyc ... le-dossier
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com ... ussia/amp/
You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
My sources are not far right. Most people would consider them reputable.
306/232
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
-
- Princess
- Posts: 22440
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm
If you want a good laugh, read the About Us section of Flag and Cross.libbylu wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:48 amYes it is. Maybe we’re just now finding out that she’s a Russian troll!?CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 amShe asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT,DSamuels wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:31 pm
Is your google broken? I posted at least one in another post yesterday or the day before. Let’s see what I can find....
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washin ... eparing-t/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/townhall.c ... 3famp=true
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dailyc ... le-dossier
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com ... ussia/amp/
You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
And the one in the OP is also questionable. I googled it - Flag and Cross- but nothing shows up.
306/232
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
-
- Regent
- Posts: 3695
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:26 am
Okay, I will!CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:24 pmIf you want a good laugh, read the About Us section of Flag and Cross.libbylu wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:48 amYes it is. Maybe we’re just now finding out that she’s a Russian troll!?CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 am
She asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT,
You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
And the one in the OP is also questionable. I googled it - Flag and Cross- but nothing shows up.
-
- Regent
- Posts: 3695
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:26 am
I just read it.CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:24 pmIf you want a good laugh, read the About Us section of Flag and Cross.libbylu wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:48 amYes it is. Maybe we’re just now finding out that she’s a Russian troll!?CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 am
She asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT,
You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
And the one in the OP is also questionable. I googled it - Flag and Cross- but nothing shows up.
Oh my....
-
- Princess
- Posts: 22440
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm
HAHAHA, yep.libbylu wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:37 pmI just read it.CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:24 pmIf you want a good laugh, read the About Us section of Flag and Cross.
Oh my....
306/232
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
- Poietes
- Regent
- Posts: 2492
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2018 11:57 am
I’m pretty sure it was you who impied to me to look at the the “factual reporting” line and if that’s high then the bias doesn’t matter when I challenged one of your sources once. Not that I’m agruing the article I’m just curious on what is the standard for a “garbage source”? Can I start criticizing left bias sources without anyone getting butt hurt?TheQueenOfEverything wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:27 am 8E19A0BF-5EE3-41E2-8171-1191423A0607.jpegCF76985F-6BB0-4066-9331-F4763C86A6D7.jpeg6F64542B-04D1-49FC-8787-61BA3290F488.jpeg91BB0A59-6E48-4107-AB70-96F5F7B285B6.jpegDSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 10:51 amI did not know what RT was, no. I did some research and since they are a very highly rated news service in 47 countries, a lot of them socialist countries, I am surprised that liberals wouldn’t trust them.CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 am
She asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT,
You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
My sources are not far right. Most people would consider them reputable.
”Just because you can doesn’t mean you should.”
-
- Regent
- Posts: 3695
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:26 am
-
- Regent
- Posts: 3010
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:45 pm
Read the whole comment thread. She specifically said her sources weren’t far right sources. All but one of them are, and even that one is still right wing.. she also said they are reputable, but only one of them has a high factual rating and it isn’t even the same one as the one that’s only pretty right wing instead of far right.
You really need to quit trying to find this “gotcha” moment with me; it’s not going to happen. Nobody is butthurt about anything. Criticize whatever you want, I’m not your mommy. Just don’t expect me to not point out your hypocrisy & undeniably right wing bias, or believe you when you try to pretend you are a moderate
You really need to quit trying to find this “gotcha” moment with me; it’s not going to happen. Nobody is butthurt about anything. Criticize whatever you want, I’m not your mommy. Just don’t expect me to not point out your hypocrisy & undeniably right wing bias, or believe you when you try to pretend you are a moderate
Poietes wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 9:50 pmI’m pretty sure it was you who impied to me to look at the the “factual reporting” line and if that’s high then the bias doesn’t matter when I challenged one of your sources once. Not that I’m agruing the article I’m just curious on what is the standard for a “garbage source”? Can I start criticizing left bias sources without anyone getting butt hurt?TheQueenOfEverything wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:27 am 8E19A0BF-5EE3-41E2-8171-1191423A0607.jpegCF76985F-6BB0-4066-9331-F4763C86A6D7.jpeg6F64542B-04D1-49FC-8787-61BA3290F488.jpeg91BB0A59-6E48-4107-AB70-96F5F7B285B6.jpegDSamuels wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 10:51 am
I did not know what RT was, no. I did some research and since they are a very highly rated news service in 47 countries, a lot of them socialist countries, I am surprised that liberals wouldn’t trust them.
My sources are not far right. Most people would consider them reputable.