CONFIRMED: British Spy Testifies That Hillary Paid Him to Help Challenge Trump Victory

Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.

Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source

Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.

Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.

Report when things come up.

Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.

Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Della
Princess
Princess
Posts: 22440
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Unread post

DSamuels wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 10:51 am
CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 am
DSamuels wrote: Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:31 pm

Is your google broken? I posted at least one in another post yesterday or the day before. Let’s see what I can find....

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washin ... eparing-t/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/townhall.c ... 3famp=true

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dailyc ... le-dossier

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com ... ussia/amp/
She asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT, 😂😂😂😂😂

You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
I did not know what RT was, no. I did some research and since they are a very highly rated news service in 47 countries, a lot of them socialist countries, I am surprised that liberals wouldn’t trust them.

My sources are not far right. Most people would consider them reputable.
Three of your sources are absolutely far right and the other one is for other fools.
306/232

But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
Della
Princess
Princess
Posts: 22440
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Unread post

DSamuels wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 10:51 am
CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 am
DSamuels wrote: Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:31 pm

Is your google broken? I posted at least one in another post yesterday or the day before. Let’s see what I can find....

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washin ... eparing-t/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/townhall.c ... 3famp=true

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dailyc ... le-dossier

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com ... ussia/amp/
She asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT, 😂😂😂😂😂

You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
I did not know what RT was, no. I did some research and since they are a very highly rated news service in 47 countries, a lot of them socialist countries, I am surprised that liberals wouldn’t trust them.

My sources are not far right. Most people would consider them reputable.
Three of your sources are absolutely far right and the other one is for other fools.
306/232

But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
Della
Princess
Princess
Posts: 22440
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Unread post

libbylu wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:48 am
CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 am
DSamuels wrote: Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:31 pm

Is your google broken? I posted at least one in another post yesterday or the day before. Let’s see what I can find....

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washin ... eparing-t/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/townhall.c ... 3famp=true

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dailyc ... le-dossier

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com ... ussia/amp/
She asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT, 😂😂😂😂😂

You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
Yes it is. Maybe we’re just now finding out that she’s a Russian troll!?
And the one in the OP is also questionable. I googled it - Flag and Cross- but nothing shows up.
If you want a good laugh, read the About Us section of Flag and Cross.
306/232

But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
libbylu
Regent
Regent
Posts: 3695
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:26 am

Unread post

CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:24 pm
libbylu wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:48 am
CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 am

She asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT, 😂😂😂😂😂

You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
Yes it is. Maybe we’re just now finding out that she’s a Russian troll!?
And the one in the OP is also questionable. I googled it - Flag and Cross- but nothing shows up.
If you want a good laugh, read the About Us section of Flag and Cross.
Okay, I will!😉
libbylu
Regent
Regent
Posts: 3695
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:26 am

Unread post

CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:24 pm
libbylu wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:48 am
CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 am

She asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT, 😂😂😂😂😂

You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
Yes it is. Maybe we’re just now finding out that she’s a Russian troll!?
And the one in the OP is also questionable. I googled it - Flag and Cross- but nothing shows up.
If you want a good laugh, read the About Us section of Flag and Cross.
I just read it.
😆
Oh my....
Della
Princess
Princess
Posts: 22440
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Unread post

libbylu wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:37 pm
CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:24 pm
libbylu wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:48 am
Yes it is. Maybe we’re just now finding out that she’s a Russian troll!?
And the one in the OP is also questionable. I googled it - Flag and Cross- but nothing shows up.
If you want a good laugh, read the About Us section of Flag and Cross.
I just read it.
😆
Oh my....
HAHAHA, yep.
306/232

But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
User avatar
Aletheia
Regent
Regent
Posts: 2254
Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 8:44 pm
Location: England

Unread post

libbylu wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:48 am And the one in the OP is also questionable. I googled it - Flag and Cross- but nothing shows up.
I looked at the other stories on their website.

And oh, my goodness...
User avatar
Poietes
Regent
Regent
Posts: 2492
Joined: Thu May 24, 2018 11:57 am

Unread post

TheQueenOfEverything wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:27 am 8E19A0BF-5EE3-41E2-8171-1191423A0607.jpegCF76985F-6BB0-4066-9331-F4763C86A6D7.jpeg6F64542B-04D1-49FC-8787-61BA3290F488.jpeg91BB0A59-6E48-4107-AB70-96F5F7B285B6.jpeg
DSamuels wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 10:51 am
CockatooCrazyColt529 wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:10 am

She asked for reputable sources, not the Washington Times, Townhall, the Daily Caller, or RT, 😂😂😂😂😂

You are aware that RT is a Russian government propaganda source, yes?
I did not know what RT was, no. I did some research and since they are a very highly rated news service in 47 countries, a lot of them socialist countries, I am surprised that liberals wouldn’t trust them.

My sources are not far right. Most people would consider them reputable.
I’m pretty sure it was you who impied to me to look at the the “factual reporting” line and if that’s high then the bias doesn’t matter when I challenged one of your sources once. Not that I’m agruing the article I’m just curious on what is the standard for a “garbage source”? Can I start criticizing left bias sources without anyone getting butt hurt?
”Just because you can doesn’t mean you should.”
libbylu
Regent
Regent
Posts: 3695
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:26 am

Unread post

Aletheia wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 9:43 pm
libbylu wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:48 am And the one in the OP is also questionable. I googled it - Flag and Cross- but nothing shows up.
I looked at the other stories on their website.

And oh, my goodness...
Yep
🤪
TheQueenOfEverything
Regent
Regent
Posts: 3010
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:45 pm

Unread post

Read the whole comment thread. She specifically said her sources weren’t far right sources. All but one of them are, and even that one is still right wing.. she also said they are reputable, but only one of them has a high factual rating and it isn’t even the same one as the one that’s only pretty right wing instead of far right.

You really need to quit trying to find this “gotcha” moment with me; it’s not going to happen. Nobody is butthurt about anything. Criticize whatever you want, I’m not your mommy. Just don’t expect me to not point out your hypocrisy & undeniably right wing bias, or believe you when you try to pretend you are a moderate 🤷‍♀️
Poietes wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 9:50 pm
TheQueenOfEverything wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 11:27 am 8E19A0BF-5EE3-41E2-8171-1191423A0607.jpegCF76985F-6BB0-4066-9331-F4763C86A6D7.jpeg6F64542B-04D1-49FC-8787-61BA3290F488.jpeg91BB0A59-6E48-4107-AB70-96F5F7B285B6.jpeg
DSamuels wrote: Wed Dec 19, 2018 10:51 am

I did not know what RT was, no. I did some research and since they are a very highly rated news service in 47 countries, a lot of them socialist countries, I am surprised that liberals wouldn’t trust them.

My sources are not far right. Most people would consider them reputable.
I’m pretty sure it was you who impied to me to look at the the “factual reporting” line and if that’s high then the bias doesn’t matter when I challenged one of your sources once. Not that I’m agruing the article I’m just curious on what is the standard for a “garbage source”? Can I start criticizing left bias sources without anyone getting butt hurt?
Locked Previous topicNext topic