Mom Confessions

morgan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:21 pm Delete this group? Then what?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:57 pm Big challenges.
I'd vote for starting fresh - just group delete. I fear your reports will increase though as people will mainly be fighting over opinions without being able to post articles that support their opinion. As I said before, many sites are requiring subscriptions- so I know when I see a Washington Post link I won't even click on it - can't read it. But this is a necessary evil for you to remain searchable and monetized by Google. Trying to maintain lists of authorizations would be a nightmare.

12skipafew wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:42 pm Things also get more difficult with a forum. If I reposted an article with written authorization or shared it within guidelines on a blog, I could appeal to google with my evidence and have the content indexed and monetized again.

With a forum, I would have to research each source and request authorization either from the source or have the person who posted acquire authorization and then submit evidence. At this point news and politics has a lot of topics made and most of them are articles.

My options at this point are to either delete all of the current posts made, go through myself and adjust the posts, or request the topic authors to change the posts, then resubmit to google and hope that it’s good enough.

I really don’t want to start fresh with news and politics but it would be the easier option since this is the main group they are upset about. I’m going to think of ways I can do this without effecting things too much. One option I was thinking about is to delete older posts and change up the newer ones to fit the guidelines.

morgan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:21 pm Delete this group? Then what?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:57 pm Big challenges.
I'd vote for starting fresh - just group delete. I fear your reports will increase though as people will mainly be fighting over opinions without being able to post articles that support their opinion. As I said before, many sites are requiring subscriptions- so I know when I see a Washington Post link I won't even click on it - can't read it. But this is a necessary evil for you to remain searchable and monetized by Google. Trying to maintain lists of authorizations would be a nightmare.

12skipafew wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:42 pm Things also get more difficult with a forum. If I reposted an article with written authorization or shared it within guidelines on a blog, I could appeal to google with my evidence and have the content indexed and monetized again.

With a forum, I would have to research each source and request authorization either from the source or have the person who posted acquire authorization and then submit evidence. At this point news and politics has a lot of topics made and most of them are articles.

My options at this point are to either delete all of the current posts made, go through myself and adjust the posts, or request the topic authors to change the posts, then resubmit to google and hope that it’s good enough.

I really don’t want to start fresh with news and politics but it would be the easier option since this is the main group they are upset about. I’m going to think of ways I can do this without effecting things too much. One option I was thinking about is to delete older posts and change up the newer ones to fit the guidelines.

morgan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:47 pm Well, I apologize. I'm totally guilty of posting entire articles. I didn't know, and now that I do I'll make sure not to. I'll also do my part in whatever is necessary to either fix it, (going back and editing my threads if need be) or go along with a transition and helping out there any way I can. I really like this group.

Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:50 pm

morgan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:47 pm Well, I apologize. I'm totally guilty of posting entire articles. I didn't know, and now that I do I'll make sure not to. I'll also do my part in whatever is necessary to either fix it, (going back and editing my threads if need be) or go along with a transition and helping out there any way I can. I really like this group.

wow, what a suck up.

Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:30 pm Are you getting a cut?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:29 pm I'm not going to call them idiots, but progressives really may have an issue with it.

Myself, as a capitalist, I'm happy to help figure out the best way to improve or optimize monetization, without me subscribing that is.

Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:23 pm When the idiot progressives figure out what monetize means, they are going to be pissed anyway.

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:01 pm
Nope.
I'd have to declare that at work and I'm sure there would be some conflict that some busy body would point to.

You?

Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:30 pm Are you getting a cut?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:29 pm I'm not going to call them idiots, but progressives really may have an issue with it.

Myself, as a capitalist, I'm happy to help figure out the best way to improve or optimize monetization, without me subscribing that is.

Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:08 pm Not yet.

We are piss poor Capitalists yes?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:01 pm
Nope.
I'd have to declare that at work and I'm sure there would be some conflict that some busy body would point to.

You?

Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:30 pm Are you getting a cut?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:26 pm I like to think of it as charitable - I'm allowing others to consume any share that I might want. All in the name of career responsibility. I've too much time invested to jeopardize my current monetary stream.

Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:08 pm Not yet.

We are piss poor Capitalists yes?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:01 pm
Nope.
I'd have to declare that at work and I'm sure there would be some conflict that some busy body would point to.

You?

Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:30 pm Are you getting a cut?

KnotaDinghy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:29 pm I'm not going to call them idiots, but progressives really may have an issue with it.

Myself, as a capitalist, I'm happy to help figure out the best way to improve or optimize monetization, without me subscribing that is.

Billie.jeens wrote: ↑Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:23 pm When the idiot progressives figure out what monetize means, they are going to be pissed anyway.