Reward people who use the system
-
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 8811
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2018 5:20 pm
Why are people so invested in other people’s personal lives and details on here? Don’t you have your own?
-
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 8811
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2018 5:20 pm
You have to be one big loser to be asking people for those details online.SeeYouNextTuesday wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:02 pmWaiting on those paystubs redRedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:45 amokay Becky. I can post my tax records if you like. We never qualified for WIC. I would have used it if we qualified because my twins were on the high calorie Neosure which costs twice as much as regular formula and I originally thought I was going to be EBF. But we got turned down so we survived off of free samples from the pediatrician office and I got a lot of those coupons they mail you and formula vouchers and used those.SeeYouNextTuesday wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:42 am
Right
I’ll reopen cafemom and pull the comment you made
Your story changed once you moved over here
Some of us remember redbottoms on cm
I have told this story before on both sites.
Not all of us can spend all day on here
yes thank you for backing my story up. It was not for stomachs though it was the high calorie formula because they were underweight from being preemies. But yes-you have most of the story rightDylexsmommy wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:57 amNo I remember this. She applied for WIC due to something going on with the boys and the super sensitivity of their stomachs (I don't really remember what the issue was) and was denied. The formula for their super sensitive stomachs was super expensive but they managed to figure it out.SeeYouNextTuesday wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:40 amThat’s not the story you gave on cmRedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:38 am
that was always the story. We made exactly $1000 too much to qualify and that was that. We had to figure it out on our own and we did.
thank you. that is correct. We did get EIC for years back but I never really considered that welfare. I know people agree or disagree on that. We have not had EIC in several years now though. DH started making too much probably at least 4 years ago.Anonymous 9 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:56 am You’re slightly off. She never got WIC, but they received EIC, which she doesn’t consider welfare.
Not a dig against you, Red, just giving the correct story.
SeeYouNextTuesday wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:49 amOk SusanRedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:45 am
okay Becky. I can post my tax records if you like. We never qualified for WIC. I would have used it if we qualified because my twins were on the high calorie Neosure which costs twice as much as regular formula and I originally thought I was going to be EBF. But we got turned down so we survived off of free samples from the pediatrician office and I got a lot of those coupons they mail you and formula vouchers and used those.
I have told this story before on both sites.
Post whatever you want it’s hilarious when you post proof
Your life must be truly horrible and pathetic to feel you have to dig out paperwork from 2007 in order to "prove" someone wrong. I'm glad I have friends and family in real life, I would hate to be like you.RedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:12 pmbwahaha lucky for me I keep receipts!SeeYouNextTuesday wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:51 amDon’t forget to include the few months of paystubs after the twinsRedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:45 am
okay Becky. I can post my tax records if you like. We never qualified for WIC. I would have used it if we qualified because my twins were on the high calorie Neosure which costs twice as much as regular formula and I originally thought I was going to be EBF. But we got turned down so we survived off of free samples from the pediatrician office and I got a lot of those coupons they mail you and formula vouchers and used those.
I have told this story before on both sites.
This is 2007's tax return which is the year I had the twins. Our yearly income was $36, 375. Which is too much for WIC qualifications which was over the WIC income limit for a family of four at that time. Now it would not be because of inflation, but it was then.
I tried to find exactly what the cut off was but apparently finding it is not easy as I could not.
48396626_10215982197961987_1752923672739315712_n.jpg
thanks Becky. Then why are you posting on here? We keep all the tax returns in one manila folder so it took me just a minute or so to find itAnonymous 10 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:30 pmYour life must be truly horrible and pathetic to feel you have to dig out paperwork from 2007 in order to "prove" someone wrong. I'm glad I have friends and family in real life, I would hate to be like you.RedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:12 pmbwahaha lucky for me I keep receipts!SeeYouNextTuesday wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:51 am
Don’t forget to include the few months of paystubs after the twins
This is 2007's tax return which is the year I had the twins. Our yearly income was $36, 375. Which is too much for WIC qualifications which was over the WIC income limit for a family of four at that time. Now it would not be because of inflation, but it was then.
I tried to find exactly what the cut off was but apparently finding it is not easy as I could not.
48396626_10215982197961987_1752923672739315712_n.jpg
I definitely would have waited to have children until my income was higher.RedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:12 pmbwahaha lucky for me I keep receipts!SeeYouNextTuesday wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:51 amDon’t forget to include the few months of paystubs after the twinsRedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:45 am
okay Becky. I can post my tax records if you like. We never qualified for WIC. I would have used it if we qualified because my twins were on the high calorie Neosure which costs twice as much as regular formula and I originally thought I was going to be EBF. But we got turned down so we survived off of free samples from the pediatrician office and I got a lot of those coupons they mail you and formula vouchers and used those.
I have told this story before on both sites.
This is 2007's tax return which is the year I had the twins. Our yearly income was $36, 375. Which is too much for WIC qualifications which was over the WIC income limit for a family of four at that time. Now it would not be because of inflation, but it was then.
I tried to find exactly what the cut off was but apparently finding it is not easy as I could not.
48396626_10215982197961987_1752923672739315712_n.jpg
I am a different anon, but we are both showing as anon 10 I think.Anonymous 10 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:30 pmYour life must be truly horrible and pathetic to feel you have to dig out paperwork from 2007 in order to "prove" someone wrong. I'm glad I have friends and family in real life, I would hate to be like you.RedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:12 pmbwahaha lucky for me I keep receipts!SeeYouNextTuesday wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:51 am
Don’t forget to include the few months of paystubs after the twins
This is 2007's tax return which is the year I had the twins. Our yearly income was $36, 375. Which is too much for WIC qualifications which was over the WIC income limit for a family of four at that time. Now it would not be because of inflation, but it was then.
I tried to find exactly what the cut off was but apparently finding it is not easy as I could not.
48396626_10215982197961987_1752923672739315712_n.jpg
I have infertility so that was not an option for me. It was kinda then or never. And like I said-we did okay. We had a house. Two reliable cars. Furniture. Savings. Health Insurance etc. Our kids had every toy that came out mostly because a lot of people wanted to buy them things.Anonymous 10 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:50 pmI definitely would have waited to have children until my income was higher.RedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:12 pmbwahaha lucky for me I keep receipts!SeeYouNextTuesday wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:51 am
Don’t forget to include the few months of paystubs after the twins
This is 2007's tax return which is the year I had the twins. Our yearly income was $36, 375. Which is too much for WIC qualifications which was over the WIC income limit for a family of four at that time. Now it would not be because of inflation, but it was then.
I tried to find exactly what the cut off was but apparently finding it is not easy as I could not.
48396626_10215982197961987_1752923672739315712_n.jpg
We did not do without anything important.
It was a struggle sometimes making ends meet but mostly we just had to budget very carefully. I did not get to send out fancy baby announcements or have fancy maternity or newborn photo shoots and I had to get the cheaper double stroller instead of the fancy really cool ones-things like that. It was still mostly first world problems.
Having credit is nothing to brag about.RedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:15 amnot true. My credit score is always higher than his. I can check it right now and it will be higher than his. Because you get points for having established credit longer and I had perfect credit for years before I met him and he even started establishing credit.Anonymous 7 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:59 amYour credit report and bank account that are a result of YOUR HUSBAND'S success at work. That's a testament to HIM, NOT you.RedBottoms wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:22 am
My credit report and bank account would suggest otherwise
You contribute nothing. You're living off of your husband.
Any credit you MAY have had on your own before marriage has long aged off. Stop with your superiority. It's false.
and my name is first on everything from the mortgage to the bank accounts to the car loans. So no, I have really really good credit actually.