You have no faith in women if you think no woman could beat any man, ever, not even a really small guy or a trans person.Slimshandy wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 9:18 pmIt would be unfair, In track meets, that would mean natural born women get a head start to men and transgender women.
It’s pretty bad for everyone involved…
Arkansas Governor signs new executive law to protect women.
Forum rules
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
Keep News and Politics about News and Politics.
Do not post full articles from other websites. Always link back to the source
Discuss things respectfully and take into account that each person has a different opinion.
Remember that this is a place for everyone to enjoy. Don’t try and run people off of the site. If you are upset with someone then utilize the foe feature.
Report when things come up.
Personal attacks are against guidelines however attacks need to be directed at a member on the forum for it to be against guidelines. Lying is not against guidelines, it’s hard for us to prove someone even did lie.
Once a topic is locked we consider the issue handled and no longer respond to new reports on the topic.
-
- Regent
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:38 pm
-
- Duchess
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am
This has nothing to do with faith in women.SallyMae wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 11:30 pmYou have no faith in women if you think no woman could beat any man, ever, not even a really small guy or a trans person.Slimshandy wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 9:18 pmIt would be unfair, In track meets, that would mean natural born women get a head start to men and transgender women.
It’s pretty bad for everyone involved…
Again, do you think Flo Jo was slower than Usain Bolt because she just didn’t try hard enough? She didn’t train hard enough? She didn’t have enough stupid songs propping her up?
You are a science denier if you don’t believe men and women’s bodies differ. Sorry to say it, but maybe you can write a song about it…maybe if we play “this is our fight song” our top athletes get faster and stronger than their top athletes.
- MonarchMom
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 5808
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 8:52 pm
Who is "our" and "their" in your understanding?Slimshandy wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 7:27 am
This has nothing to do with faith in women.
Again, do you think Flo Jo was slower than Usain Bolt because she just didn’t try hard enough? She didn’t train hard enough? She didn’t have enough stupid songs propping her up?
You are a science denier if you don’t believe men and women’s bodies differ. Sorry to say it, but maybe you can write a song about it…maybe if we play “this is our fight song” our top athletes get faster and stronger than their top athletes.
-
- Duchess
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am
This is a group full of women.MonarchMom wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 7:55 amWho is "our" and "their" in your understanding?Slimshandy wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 7:27 am
This has nothing to do with faith in women.
Again, do you think Flo Jo was slower than Usain Bolt because she just didn’t try hard enough? She didn’t train hard enough? She didn’t have enough stupid songs propping her up?
You are a science denier if you don’t believe men and women’s bodies differ. Sorry to say it, but maybe you can write a song about it…maybe if we play “this is our fight song” our top athletes get faster and stronger than their top athletes.
We’re talking about the differences between women and men in sports.
If we pay attention to context clues, I think you already know…
- MonarchMom
- Princess Royal
- Posts: 5808
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 8:52 pm
I am a woman, and a member of this group. But I do not identify with any "our team" as opposed to "their team" in your statements. I don't feel the need to view trans women as "other" or as "men."Slimshandy wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 8:03 amThis is a group full of women.MonarchMom wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 7:55 amWho is "our" and "their" in your understanding?Slimshandy wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 7:27 am
This has nothing to do with faith in women.
Again, do you think Flo Jo was slower than Usain Bolt because she just didn’t try hard enough? She didn’t train hard enough? She didn’t have enough stupid songs propping her up?
You are a science denier if you don’t believe men and women’s bodies differ. Sorry to say it, but maybe you can write a song about it…maybe if we play “this is our fight song” our top athletes get faster and stronger than their top athletes.
We’re talking about the differences between women and men in sports.
If we pay attention to context clues, I think you already know…
I asked for clarification because I didn't want to presume your meaning. Please do not presume you speak for all the women in this group with your opinions.
-
- Duchess
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am
Oh Jesus Christ…MonarchMom wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 8:21 amI am a woman, and a member of this group. But I do not identify with any "our team" as opposed to "their team" in your statements. I don't feel the need to view trans women as "other" or as "men."Slimshandy wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 8:03 amThis is a group full of women.
We’re talking about the differences between women and men in sports.
If we pay attention to context clues, I think you already know…
I asked for clarification because I didn't want to presume your meaning. Please do not presume you speak for all the women in this group with your opinions.
We means women, like when I was talking about Flo Jo
Their means men, like when I was talking about Usain Bolt.
If you are so caught up in identity politics that you also can’t admit that science has proven there is a difference between the male and female body when at the uppermost level of athletes, you are also a science denier.
-
- Regent
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 10:12 am
I also know someone who is trans and (male to female) and she is way smaller than I am. I think this is a spurious argument foisted on us by the right wing conservatives who just hate the idea of transgendering and will invent any argument to try to stop it.
-
- Princess
- Posts: 22652
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm
Republicans want control and that includes control of others bodies.EarlGrayHot wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 8:55 am I also know someone who is trans and (male to female) and she is way smaller than I am. I think this is a spurious argument foisted on us by the right wing conservatives who just hate the idea of transgendering and will invent any argument to try to stop it.
306/232
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
-
- Duchess
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:30 am
Or maybe republicans have been told, “that’s not what science shows us and women will suffer if you do this” and they responded “f**k women, my feelings are more important than them“EarlGrayHot wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 8:55 am I also know someone who is trans and (male to female) and she is way smaller than I am. I think this is a spurious argument foisted on us by the right wing conservatives who just hate the idea of transgendering and will invent any argument to try to stop it.
And then democrats were told “that’s not what science shows us and women will suffer if you do this” and they responded with “f**k women, my feelings are more important than them”…
Science no longer matters to either of them, we’re now in the age of feelings mattering more than facts… for both republicans and democrats.
-
- Princess
- Posts: 22652
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:46 pm
Fact is transgenders exist just as they always have, but now they're out of the closet and the Republicans can't stand it. When did the COTUS stop covering them?Slimshandy wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 9:06 amOr maybe republicans have been told, “that’s not what science shows us and women will suffer if you do this” and they responded “f**k women, my feelings are more important than them“EarlGrayHot wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 8:55 am I also know someone who is trans and (male to female) and she is way smaller than I am. I think this is a spurious argument foisted on us by the right wing conservatives who just hate the idea of transgendering and will invent any argument to try to stop it.
And then democrats were told “that’s not what science shows us and women will suffer if you do this” and they responded with “f**k women, my feelings are more important than them”…
Science no longer matters to either of them, we’re now in the age of feelings mattering more than facts… for both republicans and democrats.
306/232
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!
But I'm still the winner! They lied! They cheated! They stole the election!