They have equal custody so how is he getting out of supporting his kids? Why should DH support them more than BM? Why does she get reimbursement and not DH?Diamepphyre wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 12:46 pmExactly.
Here's the way the law sees it: If BM and your DH were still together, both parents would be contributing their full share toward the cost of raising the children, and they would naturally have "equal" custody. Just because they are no longer together does not mean he should magically get out of supporting the children he helped bring into the world. That includes housing, clothing, medical care, extracurriculars, schooling, etc. ad nauseum. And it's none of your business what she does with the money so long as the kids are being provided for. Even if her boyfriend is paying for all those things, the money is coming out of *their* income, and the support your DH has to pay is meant to reimburse for that. If you don't have the emotional maturity to accept that it's a GOOD thing for a man to actually live up to his responsibility to provide for children he has with someone else, then you should not have married him.
It seems to me that you need to learn how to read and comprehend.