It's a possibility that they might. That child is the only living link to their son. I don't know for sure that they will, but wanted to tell her that it's possible. Just because it's not likely, doesn't mean it won't happen.Anonymous 4 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:57 amIt is unlikely to happen today so why are you pretending like they will get rights? That is messed up.agander2017 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:38 am It was the state of Oregon. My grandparents had visitation rights with my cousin, because my Uncle was in the military, and him and my cousin's mom were divorced. Since he wasn't there to make sure they got to see her, they were awarded grandparent's rights, and got to have her every other weekend. This was back in the 80's early 90's so things could have changed since then. I'm just saying, don't be surprised if they take it to court and get some kind of visitation.
Anonymous 4 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:33 am In which state?
In my state there are no grandparents rights.
You are making shit up
Freaking out BIG time! I need answers ASAP!!!!!
- agander2017
- Monkey's Mama
-
Princess Royal
- Posts: 5958
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 11:11 am
- Location: Lost in my own mind. Enter at your own risk.
Even in Oregon it wouldn't happen.agander2017 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 10:00 amIt's a possibility that they might. That child is the only living link to their son. I don't know for sure that they will, but wanted to tell her that it's possible. Just because it's not likely, doesn't mean it won't happen.Anonymous 4 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:57 amIt is unlikely to happen today so why are you pretending like they will get rights? That is messed up.agander2017 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:38 am It was the state of Oregon. My grandparents had visitation rights with my cousin, because my Uncle was in the military, and him and my cousin's mom were divorced. Since he wasn't there to make sure they got to see her, they were awarded grandparent's rights, and got to have her every other weekend. This was back in the 80's early 90's so things could have changed since then. I'm just saying, don't be surprised if they take it to court and get some kind of visitation.
You said if they are related they have rights. That's not true. Stop spreading lies
A quick google search tells me that “grandparents rights” hasn’t been a thing in Oregon since 2001. Also, for a non-parent to get visitation, they would need to have already established a relationship with the child.agander2017 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:38 am It was the state of Oregon. My grandparents had visitation rights with my cousin, because my Uncle was in the military, and him and my cousin's mom were divorced. Since he wasn't there to make sure they got to see her, they were awarded grandparent's rights, and got to have her every other weekend. This was back in the 80's early 90's so things could have changed since then. I'm just saying, don't be surprised if they take it to court and get some kind of visitation.
Anonymous 4 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:33 am In which state?
In my state there are no grandparents rights.
You are making shit upagander2017 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:31 am If they are found to be her blood relatives, they have rights.
- agander2017
- Monkey's Mama
-
Princess Royal
- Posts: 5958
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 11:11 am
- Location: Lost in my own mind. Enter at your own risk.
Like I said, this was in the 80's early 90's. I didn't look at the current law.Anonymous 5 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 12:23 pmA quick google search tells me that “grandparents rights” hasn’t been a thing in Oregon since 2001. Also, for a non-parent to get visitation, they would need to have already established a relationship with the child.agander2017 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:38 am It was the state of Oregon. My grandparents had visitation rights with my cousin, because my Uncle was in the military, and him and my cousin's mom were divorced. Since he wasn't there to make sure they got to see her, they were awarded grandparent's rights, and got to have her every other weekend. This was back in the 80's early 90's so things could have changed since then. I'm just saying, don't be surprised if they take it to court and get some kind of visitation.
Anonymous 4 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:33 am In which state?
In my state there are no grandparents rights.
You are making shit up
So why go around and lie by saying stuff like this?agander2017 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:29 amLike I said, this was in the 80's early 90's. I didn't look at the current law.Anonymous 5 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 12:23 pmA quick google search tells me that “grandparents rights” hasn’t been a thing in Oregon since 2001. Also, for a non-parent to get visitation, they would need to have already established a relationship with the child.agander2017 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:38 am It was the state of Oregon. My grandparents had visitation rights with my cousin, because my Uncle was in the military, and him and my cousin's mom were divorced. Since he wasn't there to make sure they got to see her, they were awarded grandparent's rights, and got to have her every other weekend. This was back in the 80's early 90's so things could have changed since then. I'm just saying, don't be surprised if they take it to court and get some kind of visitation.
"If they are found to be her blood relatives, they have rights"
- agander2017
- Monkey's Mama
-
Princess Royal
- Posts: 5958
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 11:11 am
- Location: Lost in my own mind. Enter at your own risk.
I didn't say they would. I said they might. There's a huge difference between they will, and they might. Learn how to read.Anonymous 4 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:30 amSo why go around and lie by saying stuff like this?agander2017 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:29 amLike I said, this was in the 80's early 90's. I didn't look at the current law.Anonymous 5 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2019 12:23 pm
A quick google search tells me that “grandparents rights” hasn’t been a thing in Oregon since 2001. Also, for a non-parent to get visitation, they would need to have already established a relationship with the child.
"If they are found to be her blood relatives, they have rights"
That was an exact quote from you. You said if they are blood related they have rightsagander2017 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:33 amI didn't say they would. I said they might. There's a huge difference between they will, and they might. Learn how to read.Anonymous 4 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:30 amSo why go around and lie by saying stuff like this?agander2017 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:29 am
Like I said, this was in the 80's early 90's. I didn't look at the current law.
"If they are found to be her blood relatives, they have rights"
How can someone be this stupid?