Woman with mental age of child to have abortion, court rules

[morgan]

I was talking about the 2 people in particular in this thread that was mentioned by the PP I quoted.

But nice lecture - sorry you wasted your time.

Going off on inaccurate generalizations only takes this thread off rails.

There are moms on here from the party you don’t support who disagree with the ruling. So, there’s that.

Not everyone or only from the party you’re trashing fits that bill. After all, in your party there are plenty who are anti abortion and anti-choice.

If the pregnant woman wanted the baby out of her and the court ruled she had no rights due to her cognitive disability and forced the pregnancy to term, wouldn’t that also constitute anti choice? Would that alternative be the one where your party would totally jump on board with? After all, given that you people by definition ARE anti choice, it would not be surprising that you all would be celebrating that alternative.

You know I've always hated the word "pro abortion" and "anti choice" and didn't think it really fit either side well but I discovered that we have in this post two people who are both pro abortion and anti choice at the same time. It's sick and disgusting.

Yet not unsurprising considering which party they support.

[KnotaDinghy]

You know I've always hated the word "pro abortion" and "anti choice" and didn't think it really fit either side well but I discovered that we have in this post two people who are both pro abortion and anti choice at the same time. It's sick and disgusting.

It has been very interesting and eye opening. I find it sick that anyone would think it’s ok to take away the mentally disabled rights to make choices.

Forced abortions and Progressive American's who support them.

MAGA 2020.

You mean KAG 2020

[KnotaDinghy]

Going off on inaccurate generalizations only takes this thread off rails.

There are moms on here from the party you don’t support who disagree with the ruling. So, there’s that.

Not everyone or only from the party you’re trashing fits that bill. After all, in your party there are plenty who are anti abortion and anti-choice.

If the pregnant woman wanted the baby out of her and the court ruled she had no rights due to her cognitive disability and forced the pregnancy to term, wouldn’t that also constitute anti choice? Would that alternative be the one where your party would totally jump on board with? After all, given that you people by definition ARE anti choice, it would not be surprising that you all would be celebrating that alternative.

You know I've always hated the word "pro abortion" and "anti choice" and didn't think it really fit either side well but I discovered that we have in this post two people who are both pro abortion and anti choice at the same time. It's sick and disgusting.

Yet not unsurprising considering which party they support.

You people?

I think the definition you tried to generalize is anti-murder or pro-life.

You cannot say anti-choice because 'they' are trying protect a life you wants the choice to live.

[BionicBunny]

This has to be the stupidest comment I have read in this post yet.

Going off on inaccurate generalizations only takes this thread off rails.

There are moms on here from the party you don’t support who disagree with the ruling. So, there’s that.

Not everyone or only from the party you’re trashing fits that bill. After all, in your party there are plenty who are anti abortion and anti-choice.

If the pregnant woman wanted the baby out of her and the court ruled she had no rights due to her cognitive disability and forced the pregnancy to term, wouldn’t that also constitute anti choice? Would that alternative be the one where your party would totally jump on board with? After all, given that you people by definition ARE anti choice, it would not be surprising that you all would be celebrating that alternative.

You know I've always hated the word "pro abortion" and "anti choice" and didn't think it really fit either side well but I discovered that we have in this post two people who are both pro abortion and anti choice at the same time. It's sick and disgusting.

Yet not unsurprising considering which party they support.

[cgd5112]

Im well aware it was a passive aggressive call out. It is still a generalization when you align it with the party they support.
No apology needed.

I was talking about the 2 people in particular in this thread that was mentioned by the PP I quoted.

But nice lecture - sorry you wasted your time.

Going off on inaccurate generalizations only takes this thread off rails.

There are moms on here from the party you don’t support who disagree with the ruling. So, there’s that.

Not everyone or only from the party you’re trashing fits that bill. After all, in your party there are plenty who are anti abortion and anti-choice.

If the pregnant woman wanted the baby out of her and the court ruled she had no rights due to her cognitive disability and forced the pregnancy to term, wouldn’t that also constitute anti choice? Would that alternative be the one where your party would totally jump on board with? After all, given that you people by definition ARE anti choice, it would not be surprising that you all would be celebrating that alternative.

Yet not unsurprising considering which party they support.

[cgd5112]

Yes, I can and I did.

Going off on inaccurate generalizations only takes this thread off rails.

There are moms on here from the party you don’t support who disagree with the ruling. So, there’s that.

Not everyone or only from the party you’re trashing fits that bill. After all, in your party there are plenty who are anti abortion and anti-choice.

If the pregnant woman wanted the baby out of her and the court ruled she had no rights due to her cognitive disability and forced the pregnancy to term, wouldn’t that also constitute anti choice? Would that alternative be the one where your party would totally jump on board with? After all, given that you people by definition ARE anti choice, it would not be surprising that you all would be celebrating that alternative.

Yet not unsurprising considering which party they support.

You people?

I think the definition you tried to generalize is anti-murder or pro-life.

You cannot say anti-choice because 'they' are trying protect a life you wants the choice to live.

[morgan]

Why is it a generalization? They are liberals. Is the word liberal insulting to you?

Im well aware it was a passive aggressive call out. It is still a generalization when you align it with the party they support.
No apology needed.

I was talking about the 2 people in particular in this thread that was mentioned by the PP I quoted.

But nice lecture - sorry you wasted your time.

Going off on inaccurate generalizations only takes this thread off rails.

There are moms on here from the party you don’t support who disagree with the ruling. So, there’s that.

Not everyone or only from the party you’re trashing fits that bill. After all, in your party there are plenty who are anti abortion and anti-choice.

If the pregnant woman wanted the baby out of her and the court ruled she had no rights due to her cognitive disability and forced the pregnancy to term, wouldn’t that also constitute anti choice? Would that alternative be the one where your party would totally jump on board with? After all, given that you people by definition ARE anti choice, it would not be surprising that you all would be celebrating that alternative.

[Deleted User 276]

You know I've always hated the word "pro abortion" and "anti choice" and didn't think it really fit either side well but I discovered that we have in this post two people who are both pro abortion and anti choice at the same time. It's sick and disgusting.

Yet not unsurprising considering which party they support.

I am a liberal and the mother to an mentally disabled son. My comments were based on my experience within the mentally disabled community rather than based on my liberalism. Most people are multi-faceted in their views.

[cgd5112]

LOL! I liked your reply bc it made me laugh. Other than that, your sy on ignorance and transparent avoidance of a clear statement is typical of you.
Have a good night.
We’ll all resume the dance and bullshit tomorrow or another day.

Why is it a generalization? They are liberals. Is the word liberal insulting to you?

Im well aware it was a passive aggressive call out. It is still a generalization when you align it with the party they support.
No apology needed.

I was talking about the 2 people in particular in this thread that was mentioned by the PP I quoted.

But nice lecture - sorry you wasted your time.

[ReadingRainbow]

A few things here... This has nothing to do with American politics in relation to liberals and conservatives...

Secondly, This is horribly wrong, there should never, ever be forced abortions in any case...